Literature DB >> 22261761

Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges.

Laura M Beskow1, Wylie Burke, Stephanie M Fullerton, Richard R Sharp.   

Abstract

Although issues involved in offering individual results to participants in genomic research have received considerable attention, communication of aggregate results has been the subject of relatively little ethical analysis. Offering participants aggregate results is typically assumed to be a good thing, and studies have found that a significant majority of biobank research participants, when asked about their interest in aggregate results, say that access to such information would be important. Even so, return of aggregate results remains a relatively uncommon practice. In this article, we explore the opportunities involved in communicating aggregate results to participants in genomic research, including affirming the value of research participation, informing participants about research being conducted based on broad consent for future unspecified research, educating participants and the public about the research process, and building trust in the research enterprise. We also explore some of the challenges, including the complex intersection between individual and aggregate results, as well as practical hurdles. We conclude by offering our preliminary recommendations concerning the provision of aggregate results and an agenda for much-needed future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22261761      PMCID: PMC3612423          DOI: 10.1038/gim.2011.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  38 in total

1.  OECD guidelines on human biobanks and genetic research databases.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Health Law       Date:  2010-03

Review 2.  Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 3.  Transforming genetic research practices with marginalized communities: a case for responsive justice.

Authors:  Sara Goering; Suzanne Holland; Kelly Fryer-Edwards
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Reframing the dissemination challenge: a marketing and distribution perspective.

Authors:  Matthew W Kreuter; Jay M Bernhardt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Authors:  Ebony B Bookman; Aleisha A Langehorne; John H Eckfeldt; Kathleen C Glass; Gail P Jarvik; Michael Klag; Greg Koski; Arno Motulsky; Benjamin Wilfond; Teri A Manolio; Richard R Fabsitz; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission.

Authors:  Evette J Ludman; Stephanie M Fullerton; Leslie Spangler; Susan Brown Trinidad; Monica M Fujii; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Wylie Burke
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.

Authors:  A A Lemke; W A Wolf; J Hebert-Beirne; M E Smith
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 8.  Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.944

9.  Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Sondra J Smolek
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 10.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

View more
  31 in total

1.  Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; R Jean Cadigan; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Gail E Henderson; Marsha Michie; Daniel K Nelson; Holly K Tabor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 2.  Return of individual research results and incidental findings: facing the challenges of translational science.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  Utilizing Focus Groups with Potential Participants and Their Parents: An Approach to Inform Study Design in a Large Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sandeep Kadimpati; Jennifer B McCormick; Yichen Chiu; Ashley B Parker; Aliya Z Iftikhar; Randall P Flick; David O Warner
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  Returning Results: Let's Be Honest!

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Eva De Clercq
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-02-24

5.  Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; P Pearl O'Rourke
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  Considerations for Returning Research Results to Culturally Diverse Participants and Families of Decedents.

Authors:  Nanibaa A Garrison
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Return of individual results in epilepsy genomic research: A view from the field.

Authors:  Ruth Ottman; Catharine Freyer; Heather C Mefford; Annapurna Poduri; Daniel H Lowenstein
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Stewardship practices of U.S. biobanks.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; Teresa P Edwards; R Jean Cadigan; Arlene M Davis; Catherine Zimmer; Ian Conlon; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Disclosure of genetic research results to members of a founder population.

Authors:  Rebecca L Anderson; Kathleen Murray; Jessica X Chong; Rebecca Ouwenga; Marina Antillon; Peixian Chen; Lorena Diaz de Leon; Kathryn J Swoboda; Lucille A Lester; Soma Das; Carole Ober; Darrel J Waggoner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Allocation of Resources to Communication of Research Result Summaries.

Authors:  Julie E Richards; Emmi Bane; Stephanie M Fullerton; Evette J Ludman; Gail Jarvik
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.