Literature DB >> 29204889

Authorization of tissues from deceased patients for genetic research.

Maureen Wilson-Genderson1, K Laura Barker2, Heather M Gardiner3, Maghboeba Mosavel4, Jeffrey Thomas5, Laura A Siminoff6.   

Abstract

Tissues from deceased donors provide important data for genomic research and Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) play a significant role. To understand the decisions of families who donated for transplantation and made decisions about donation to the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GTEx), we examined donation decisions of family decision makers (FDMs). 413 families were interviewed by telephone. The OPO staff who made the transplant and research requests completed self-administered surveys; a total of 309 matching surveys from 99 OPO staff were obtained. 76.8% of families donated to the GTEx project. Logistic regression analysis found that FDM consent to GTEx donation was associated with endorsement of policies to promote biobanking (OR = 1.35), positive attitudes about medical research (OR = 1.1), lack of concern regarding a breach of confidentiality (OR = 1.54), comfort with tissue donation (OR = 1.24), and prior authorization to solid organ donation (OR = 3.17). OPO staff characteristics associated with GTEx donation included being female (OR = 3.57), White (OR = 4.97), comfort with hospital staff role in donation (OR = 1.61), and number of topics discussed with families (OR = 57.9). Donor type, FDM attitudes, OPO staff sociodemographics, OPO comfort with the GTEx authorization process, and intensity of discussing research-specific issues were significantly associated with GTEx donation decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29204889      PMCID: PMC7521139          DOI: 10.1007/s00439-017-1855-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  39 in total

1.  An exploratory study of relational, persuasive, and nonverbal communication in requests for tissue donation.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather M Traino; Nahida H Gordon
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-05-24

2.  Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research.

Authors:  Altovise T Ewing; Lori A H Erby; Juli Bollinger; Eva Tetteyfio; Luisel J Ricks-Santi; David Kaufman
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives.

Authors:  J M Oliver; M J Slashinski; T Wang; P A Kelly; S G Hilsenbeck; A L McGuire
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Genomic research with the newly dead: a crossroads for ethics and policy.

Authors:  Rebecca L Walker; Eric T Juengst; Warren Whipple; Arlene M Davis
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Contributing to research via biobanks: what it means to cancer patients.

Authors:  Isabelle Pellegrini; Christian Chabannon; Julien Mancini; Frederic Viret; Norbert Vey; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Consent Issues in Genetic Research: Views of Research Participants.

Authors:  Deborah Goodman; Catherine O Johnson; Lari Wenzel; Deborah Bowen; Celeste Condit; Karen L Edwards
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.

Authors:  Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; David Kaufman; Gail Geller; Lisa LeRoy; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Unexpected findings in the exploration of African American underrepresentation in biospecimen collection and biobanks.

Authors:  Nao Hagiwara; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Carie Francis; Lauren Ramsey; Robert A Chapman; Terrance L Albrecht
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather M Traino; Maghboeba Mosavel; Laura Barker; Glencora Gudger; Anita Undale
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives.

Authors:  Erin D Paquette; Sabrina F Derrington; Avani Shukla; Neha Sinha; Sarah Oswald; Lauren Sorce; Kelly N Michelson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  A mixed-methods examination of public attitudes toward vascularized composite allograft donation and transplantation.

Authors:  Heather M Gardiner; Ellen E Davis; Gerard P Alolod; David B Sarwer; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.