Literature DB >> 21978049

Measuring signal-to-noise ratio in partially parallel imaging MRI.

Frank L Goerner1, Geoffrey D Clarke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess five different methods of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurement for partially parallel imaging (PPI) acquisitions.
METHODS: Measurements were performed on a spherical phantom and three volunteers using a multichannel head coil a clinical 3T MRI system to produce echo planar, fast spin echo, gradient echo, and balanced steady state free precession image acquisitions. Two different PPI acquisitions, generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition algorithm and modified sensitivity encoding with acceleration factors (R) of 2-4, were evaluated and compared to nonaccelerated acquisitions. Five standard SNR measurement techniques were investigated and Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine agreement between the various SNR methods. The estimated g-factor values, associated with each method of SNR calculation and PPI reconstruction method, were also subjected to assessments that considered the effects on SNR due to reconstruction method, phase encoding direction, and R-value.
RESULTS: Only two SNR measurement methods produced g-factors in agreement with theoretical expectations (g ≥ 1). Bland-Altman tests demonstrated that these two methods also gave the most similar results relative to the other three measurements. R-value was the only factor of the three we considered that showed significant influence on SNR changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-signal methods used in SNR evaluation do not produce results consistent with expectations in the investigated PPI protocols. Two of the methods studied provided the most accurate and useful results. Of these two methods, it is recommended, when evaluating PPI protocols, the image subtraction method be used for SNR calculations due to its relative accuracy and ease of implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21978049      PMCID: PMC3170395          DOI: 10.1118/1.3618730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  21 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images.

Authors:  M J Firbank; A Coulthard; R M Harrison; E D Williams
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  [Accuracy of signal-to-noise ratio measurement method for magnetic resonance images].

Authors:  Akio Ogura; Akira Miyai; Fumie Maeda; Hiroyuki Fukutake; Rikiya Kikumoto
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2003-04

5.  The NMR phased array.

Authors:  P B Roemer; W A Edelstein; C E Hayes; S P Souza; O M Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays.

Authors:  D K Sodickson; W J Manning
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data.

Authors:  H Gudbjartsson; S Patz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Signal-to-noise measures for magnetic resonance imagers.

Authors:  B W Murphy; P L Carson; J H Ellis; Y T Zhang; R J Hyde; T L Chenevert
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  34 in total

1.  Contrast enhancement of intracranial lesions at 1.5 T: comparison among 2D spin echo, black-blood (BB) Cube, and BB Cube-FLAIR sequences.

Authors:  SungWoon Im; Ryuichiro Ashikaga; Yukinobu Yagyu; Tetsuya Wakayama; Mitsuharu Miyoshi; Tomoko Hyodo; Izumi Imaoka; Seishi Kumano; Kazunari Ishii; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MS lesions are better detected with 3D T1 gradient-echo than with 2D T1 spin-echo gadolinium-enhanced imaging at 3T.

Authors:  A Crombé; M Saranathan; A Ruet; M Durieux; E de Roquefeuil; J C Ouallet; B Brochet; V Dousset; T Tourdias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  A comparison of five standard methods for evaluating image intensity uniformity in partially parallel imaging MRI.

Authors:  Frank L Goerner; Timothy Duong; R Jason Stafford; Geoffrey D Clarke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Improving Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions in the Posterior Fossa Using an Optimized 3D-FLAIR Sequence at 3T.

Authors:  A Lecler; I El Sanharawi; J El Methni; O Gout; P Koskas; J Savatovsky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Quiet MR sequences in clinical routine: initial experience in abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; David M Grodzki; Markus Domschke; Moritz Albrecht; Boris Bodelle; Katrin Eichler; Renate Hammerstingl; Thomas J Vogl; Stephan Zangos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Comparison of lesion enhancement between BB Cube and 3D-SPGR images for brain tumors with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hirokazu Hasegawa; Ryuichiro Ashikaga; Kaoru Okajima; Tetsuya Wakayama; Mitsuharu Miyoshi; Yasumasa Nishimura; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Novel practical SNR determination method for MRI using double echo with longest second echo time (DELSET).

Authors:  Naoki Ohno; Tosiaki Miyati; Yoshiaki Niwa; Hirohito Kan; Shota Ishida; Harumasa Kasai; Yuta Shibamoto; Toshifumi Gabata
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Signal-to-noise assessment for diffusion tensor imaging with single data set and validation using a difference image method with data from a multicenter study.

Authors:  Zhiyue J Wang; Jonathan M Chia; Shaheen Ahmed; Nancy K Rollins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Optimizing 3D FLAIR to detect MS lesions: pushing past factory settings for precise results.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; C Bouzad; R Deschamps; F Maizeroi; J C Sadik; A Gueguen; O Gout; H Picard; J Savatovsky
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Novel Metal Artifact Reduction Techniques with Use of Slice-Encoding Metal Artifact Correction and View-Angle Tilting MR Imaging for Improved Visualization of Brain Tissue near Intracranial Aneurysm Clips.

Authors:  B Friedrich; M Wostrack; F Ringel; Y-M Ryang; A Förschler; S Waldt; C Zimmer; M Nittka; C Preibisch
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.