Literature DB >> 8505876

Signal-to-noise measures for magnetic resonance imagers.

B W Murphy1, P L Carson, J H Ellis, Y T Zhang, R J Hyde, T L Chenevert.   

Abstract

The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in magnetic resonance imaging represents one of the system operating variables that must be determined both for evaluating the performance of different imaging protocols on a particular machine, and for monitoring machine performance as part of a routine quality control (QC) program. Utilizing a phantom and set of automated analysis programs currently under development, this study evaluated several ways of measuring image signal and noise and demonstrated the importance of utilizing measured voxel volumes as opposed to nominal volumes in the calculation of SNR. The NEMA proposed standard for SNR is compared with several other SNR measures and is recommended as the measure to be used in routine SNR reporting. The importance of utilizing other SNR measures in addition to the NEMA proposed standard for routine QC is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8505876     DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(93)90076-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  19 in total

1.  Measuring signal-to-noise ratio in partially parallel imaging MRI.

Authors:  Frank L Goerner; Geoffrey D Clarke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Single image signal-to-noise ratio estimation for magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  K S Sim; M A Lai; C P Tso; C C Teo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Comparison of image quality in magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla using 32-channel receiver coils.

Authors:  F Schoth; N Kraemer; T Niendorf; C Hohl; R W Gunther; G A Krombach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Optimizing isotropic three-dimensional fast spin-echo methods for imaging the knee.

Authors:  Charles Q Li; Weitian Chen; Jarrett K Rosenberg; Philip J Beatty; Richard Kijowski; Brian A Hargreaves; Reed F Busse; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Evaluation of over 100 scanner-years of computed tomography daily quality control data.

Authors:  Jessica L Nute; John Rong; Donna M Stevens; Brandan J Darensbourg; Jing Cheng; Wei Wei; Brian P Hobbs; Dianna D Cody
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Hybrid radial-cones trajectory for accelerated MRI.

Authors:  Kevin M Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain at two field strengths from two vendors.

Authors:  Kofi Deh; Thanh D Nguyen; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler; Martin R Prince; Pascal Spincemaille; Susan Gauthier; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Yan Zhang; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Signal quality of single dose gadobenate dimeglumine pulmonary MRA examinations exceeds quality of MRA performed with double dose gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Pamela K Woodard; Thomas L Chenevert; H Dirk Sostman; Kathleen A Jablonski; Paul D Stein; Lawrence R Goodman; Frank J Londy; Vamsidhar Narra; Charles A Hales; Russell D Hull; Victor F Tapson; John G Weg
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a motorized needle guide template for MRI-guided targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Sang-Eun Song; Junichi Tokuda; Kemal Tuncali; Clare M Tempany; Elizabeth Zhang; Nobuhiko Hata
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  DTI parameter optimisation for acquisition at 1.5T: SNR analysis and clinical application.

Authors:  M Laganà; M Rovaris; A Ceccarelli; C Venturelli; S Marini; G Baselli
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.