Literature DB >> 7564793

Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.

J M Bland1, D G Altman.   

Abstract

When comparing a new method of measurement with a standard method, one of the things we want to know is whether the difference between the measurements by the two methods is related to the magnitude of the measurement. A plot of the difference against the standard measurement is sometimes suggested, but this will always appear to show a relation between difference and magnitude when there is none. A plot of the difference against the average of the standard and new measurements is unlikely to mislead in this way. We show this theoretically and by a practical example.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7564793     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91748-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  437 in total

1.  Venous pH can safely replace arterial pH in the initial evaluation of patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  A M Kelly; R McAlpine; E Kyle
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  An enhanced method for left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by triggered harmonic contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  K Hirooka; Y Yasumura; Y Tsujita; A Hanatani; S Nakatani; K Miyatake; M Yamagishi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Relationship between the heparin management test and the HemoTec activated clotting time in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  S Tsimikas; R Beyer; A Hassankhani
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Validation of a field test for the non-invasive determination of badminton specific aerobic performance.

Authors:  M Wonisch; P Hofmann; G Schwaberger; S P von Duvillard; W Klein
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  RV functional imaging: 3-D echo-derived dynamic geometry and flow field simulations.

Authors:  Ares D Pasipoularides; Ming Shu; Michael S Womack; Ashish Shah; Olaf Von Ramm; Donald D Glower
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Furosemide/Fludrocortisone Test and Clinical Parameters to Diagnose Incomplete Distal Renal Tubular Acidosis in Kidney Stone Formers.

Authors:  Nasser A Dhayat; Michael W Gradwell; Ganesh Pathare; Manuel Anderegg; Lisa Schneider; David Luethi; Cedric Mattmann; Orson W Moe; Bruno Vogt; Daniel G Fuster
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Hypoglycemia in small for gestational age babies.

Authors:  M A Bhat; P Kumar; A Bhansali; S Majumdar; A Narang
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  A multicenter study evaluation of the digene hybrid capture II signal amplification technique for detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum samples and testing of EUROHEP standards.

Authors:  H G Niesters; M Krajden; L Cork; M de Medina; M Hill; E Fries; A D Osterhaus
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Development of a contouring guide in three different head set-ups for hippocampal sparing radiotherapy: a practical approach.

Authors:  Saide Di Biase; Marianna Trignani; Luciana Caravatta; Paul Ioan Voicu; Clelia Di Carlo; Annamaria Vinciguerra; Antonietta Augurio; Francesca Perrotti; Valentina Panara; Domenico Genovesi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Estimating dietary costs of low-income women in California: a comparison of 2 approaches.

Authors:  Grant J Aaron; Nancy L Keim; Adam Drewnowski; Marilyn S Townsend
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.