Literature DB >> 10616158

A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images.

M J Firbank1, A Coulthard, R M Harrison, E D Williams.   

Abstract

The signal to noise ratio (SNR) is one of the important measures of the performance of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. The object of this study was to compare a single acquisition method, which estimates the noise from background pixels, with a dual acquisition method which estimates the noise from the subtraction of two sequentially acquired images. The dual acquisition method is more exact, but is slower to perform and requires image manipulation. A comparison between the two methods gave a good correlation, and a regression equation of SNRsingle = 1.1 + 0.94 SNRdual. The single acquisition method is therefore appropriate for use in a quality assurance programme, since it is quicker and simpler to perform and is a good indicator of the more exact measure.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10616158     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/12/403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  60 in total

1.  Steady-state free precession sequences in myocardial first-pass perfusion MR imaging: comparison with TurboFLASH imaging.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Stefan Maderwald; Holger Eggebrecht; Florian M Vogt; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Measuring signal-to-noise ratio in partially parallel imaging MRI.

Authors:  Frank L Goerner; Geoffrey D Clarke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparison of volume, four- and eight-channel head coils using standard and parallel imaging.

Authors:  Elke R Gizewski; Stefan Maderwald; Isabel Wanke; Susanne Goehde; Michael Forsting; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR imaging of the cervical spine: assessment of image quality with parallel imaging compared to non-accelerated MR measurements.

Authors:  Iris-M Noebauer-Huhmann; Christian Glaser; Olaf Dietrich; Claus-Peter Wallner; Wolfgang Klinger; Herwig Imhof; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Deconvolution-interpolation gridding (DING): accurate reconstruction for arbitrary k-space trajectories.

Authors:  Refaat E Gabr; Pelin Aksit; Paul A Bottomley; Abou-Bakr M Youssef; Yasser M Kadah
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Comparison of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions and modified sensitivity encoding for diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Y A Bhagat; D J Emery; S Naik; T Yeo; C Beaulieu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Low-power slice selective imaging of broad signals.

Authors:  Weiqi Yang; Jae-Seung Lee; Boris Kharkov; Andrew J Ilott; Alexej Jerschow
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  A B1-insensitive high resolution 2D T1 mapping pulse sequence for dGEMRIC of the HIP at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Riccardo Lattanzi; Christian Glaser; Artem V Mikheev; Catherine Petchprapa; David J Mossa; Soterios Gyftopoulos; Henry Rusinek; Michael Recht; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Noise contamination from PET blood sampling pump: Effects on structural MRI image quality in simultaneous PET/MR studies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bartlett; Christine DeLorenzo; Ramin Parsey; Chuan Huang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Independent slab-phase modulation combined with parallel imaging in bilateral breast MRI.

Authors:  Misung Han; Philip J Beatty; Bruce L Daniel; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.