Literature DB >> 21776781

The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Yue-Houng Hu1, Wei Zhao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Substantial effort has been devoted to the clinical development of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). DBT is a three-dimensional (3D) x-ray imaging modality that reconstructs a number of thin image slices parallel to a stationary detector plane. Preliminary clinical studies have shown that the removal of overlapping breast tissue reduces image clutter and increases detectability of large, low contrast lesions. However, some studies, as well as anecdotal evidence, suggested decreased conspicuity of small, high contrast objects such as microcalcifications. Several investigators have proposed alternative imaging methods for improving microcalcification detection by delivering half of the total dose to the central view in addition to a separate DBT scan. Preliminary observer studies found possible improvement by either viewing the central projection alone or combining all views with a reconstruction algorithm.
METHODS: In this paper, we developed a generalized imaging theory based on a cascaded linear-system model for DBT to calculate the effect of variable angular dose distribution on the 3D modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS). Using the ideal observer signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), d', as a figure-of-merit (FOM) for a signal embedded in a uniform background, we compared the detectability of objects with different sizes under different imaging conditions (e.g., angular dose distribution and reconstruction filters). Experimental investigation was conducted for three different angular dose schemes (ADS) using a Siemens Novation(TOMO) prototype unit.
RESULTS: Our results show excellent agreement between modeled and experimental measurements of 3D NPS with different angular dose distribution. The ideal observer detectability index for the detection of Gaussian objects with different angular dose distributions depends strongly on the applied reconstruction filter as well as the imaging task. For detection tasks of small calcifications with reconstruction filters used typically in a clinical setting, variable angular dose distribution with more dose delivered to the central views may lead to higher d' than a uniform angular dose distribution.
CONCLUSIONS: The conspicuity of the detection of small calcifications may be improved, under certain imaging conditions, by delivering higher dose toward the central views of a tomosynthesis scan, while also reducing the dose at peripheral angles to keep total administered radiation dose equivalent. The degree of improvement depends on the choice of reconstruction filters as well as the imaging task. The improvement is more substantial for high-frequency imaging tasks and when an aggressive slice-thickness (ST) filter is applied to reduced the high-frequency noise at peripheral angles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21776781      PMCID: PMC3158124          DOI: 10.1118/1.3570580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds.

Authors:  F O Bochud; J F Valley; F R Verdun; C Hessler; P Schnyder
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.

Authors:  Iacovos S Kyprianou; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  S Richard; J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray; D J Moseley; B Bakhtiar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.

Authors:  Ann-Katherine Carton; Dirk Vandenbroucke; Luc Struye; Andrew D A Maidment; Yen-Hong Kao; Michael Albert; Hilde Bosmans; Guy Marchal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Amorphous selenium flat panel detectors for digital mammography: validation of a NPWE model observer with CDMAM observer performance experiments.

Authors:  Jennifer A Segui; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging.

Authors:  Samuel Richard; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.

Authors:  W Zhao; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  9 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on planar projection images.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Physics considerations in MV-CBCT multi-layer imager design.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Rony Fueglistaller; Marios Myronakis; Joerg Rottmann; Adam Wang; Daniel Shedlock; Daniel Morf; Paul Baturin; Pascal Huber; Josh Star-Lack; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Task-based strategy for optimized contrast enhanced breast imaging: analysis of six imaging techniques for mammography and tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Lynda C Ikejimba; Nooshin Kiarashi; Sujata V Ghate; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Leveraging multi-layer imager detector design to improve low-dose performance for megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Joerg Rottmann; Rony Fueglistaller; Marios Myronakis; Adam Wang; Pascal Huber; Daniel Shedlock; Daniel Morf; Paul Baturin; Josh Star-Lack; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Model and human observer reproducibility for detection of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis images of three-dimensionally structured test object.

Authors:  Dimitar Petrov; Nicholas Marshall; Kenneth Young; Guozhi Zhang; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-03-23

8.  A novel method for quantification of beam's-eye-view tumor tracking performance.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Marios Myronakis; Joerg Rottmann; Adam Wang; Daniel Morf; Daniel Shedlock; Paul Baturin; Josh Star-Lack; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Validation of a power-law noise model for simulating small-scale breast tissue.

Authors:  I Reiser; A Edwards; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.609

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.