Literature DB >> 30915383

Model and human observer reproducibility for detection of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis images of three-dimensionally structured test object.

Dimitar Petrov1, Nicholas Marshall1,2, Kenneth Young3, Guozhi Zhang2, Hilde Bosmans1,2.   

Abstract

We compare the reproducibility of the human observers and a channelized Hotelling observer (CHO), when reading digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images of a physical phantom containing a breast simulating structured background and calcification clusters at three dose levels. The phantom is scanned 217 times on a Siemens Inspiration DBT system. Volumes of interest, with and without the calcification targets, are extracted and the human observers' percentage of correct (PC) scores is evaluated using a four-alternative forced choice method. A two-layer CHO is developed using the human observer results. The first layer consists of a localizing CHO that identifies the most conspicuous calcifications using two Laguerre-Gauss channels. Then a CHO with eight Gabor channels estimates the PC score for the calcification cluster. Observer reproducibility is estimated by bootstrapping, and the standard deviation (SD) is used as a figure of merit. The CHO closely approximated the human observer results for all the three dose levels with a correlation of > 0.97 . For the larger calcification cluster sizes, both observers have similar reproducibility, whereas the CHO is more reproducible for the smaller calcifications, with a maximum of 5.5 SD against 13.1 SD for the human observers. The developed CHO is a good candidate for automated reading of the calcification clusters of the structured phantom, with better reproducibility than the human readers for small calcifications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calcifications; channelized Hotelling observer; digital breast tomosynthesis; human; model; observer; reproducibility

Year:  2019        PMID: 30915383      PMCID: PMC6430963          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.015503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  19 in total

1.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds.

Authors:  F O Bochud; J F Valley; F R Verdun; C Hessler; P Schnyder
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Contrast-detail phantom scoring methodology.

Authors:  Jerry A Thomas; Kish Chakrabarti; Richard Kaczmarek; Alexander Romanyukha
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.

Authors:  Harold L Kundel; Calvin F Nodine; Emily F Conant; Susan P Weinstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Calcifications in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Kopans; Sara Gavenonis; Elkan Halpern; Richard Moore
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 7.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.

Authors:  M Lee Spangler; Margarita L Zuley; Jules H Sumkin; Gordan Abrams; Marie A Ganott; Christiane Hakim; Ronald Perrin; Denise M Chough; Ratan Shah; David Gur
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.

Authors:  Lucy M Warren; Alistair Mackenzie; Julie Cooke; Rosalind M Given-Wilson; Matthew G Wallis; Dev P Chakraborty; David R Dance; Hilde Bosmans; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  T M Svahn; D P Chakraborty; D Ikeda; S Zackrisson; Y Do; S Mattsson; I Andersson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; William P Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui; Paul E Kinahan; Nick Bottenus; Alejandro F Frangi; Andrew Maidment; Joseph Lo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.