Literature DB >> 17388174

Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Ioannis Sechopoulos1, Sankararaman Suryanarayanan, Srinivasan Vedantham, Carl J D'Orsi, Andrew Karellas.   

Abstract

Digital tomosynthesis of the breast is being investigated as one possible solution to the problem of tissue superposition present in planar mammography. This imaging technique presents various advantages that would make it a feasible replacement for planar mammography, among them similar, if not lower, radiation glandular dose to the breast; implementation on conventional digital mammography technology via relatively simple modifications; and fast acquisition time. One significant problem that tomosynthesis of the breast must overcome, however, is the reduction of x-ray scatter inclusion in the projection images. In tomosynthesis, due to the projection geometry and radiation dose considerations, the use of an antiscatter grid presents several challenges. Therefore, the use of postacquisition software-based scatter reduction algorithms seems well justified, requiring a comprehensive evaluation of x-ray scatter content in the tomosynthesis projections. This study aims to gain insight into the behavior of x-ray scatter in tomosynthesis by characterizing the scatter point spread functions (PSFs) and the scatter to primary ratio (SPR) maps found in tomosynthesis of the breast. This characterization was performed using Monte Carlo simulations, based on the Geant4 toolkit, that simulate the conditions present in a digital tomosynthesis system, including the simulation of the compressed breast in both the cranio-caudal (CC) and the medio-lateral oblique (MLO) views. The variation of the scatter PSF with varying tomosynthesis projection angle, as well as the effects of varying breast glandular fraction and x-ray spectrum, was analyzed. The behavior of the SPR for different projection angle, breast size, thickness, glandular fraction, and x-ray spectrum was also analyzed, and computer fit equations for the magnitude of the SPR at the center of mass for both the CC and the MLO views were found. Within mammographic energies, the x-ray spectrum was found to have no appreciable effect on the scatter PSF and on the SPR. Glandular fraction and compressed breast size were found to have a small effect, while compressed breast thickness and projection angle, as expected, introduced large variations in both the scatter PSF and SPR. The presence of the breast support plate and the detector cover plate in the simulations introduced important effects on the SPR, which are also relevant to the scatter content in planar mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17388174      PMCID: PMC4280187          DOI: 10.1118/1.2428404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  33 in total

1.  An edge spread technique for measurement of the scatter-to-primary ratio in mammography.

Authors:  V N Cooper; J M Boone; J A Seibert; C J Pellot-Barakat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  James G Mainprize; Aili K Bloomquist; Michael P Kempston; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Mammography grid performance.

Authors:  P S Rezentes; A de Almeida; G T Barnes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Scatter/primary ratios for x-ray spectra modified to enhance iodine contrast in screen-film mammography.

Authors:  S L Fritz; C H Chang; W H Livingston
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The intensity of scattered radiation in mammography.

Authors:  G T Barnes; I A Brezovich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.

Authors:  J Kaufhold; J A Thomas; J W Eberhard; C E Galbo; D E González Trotter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  The New Mexico Mammography Project. Screening mammography performance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1991 to 1993.

Authors:  R D Rosenberg; J F Lando; W C Hunt; R R Darling; M R Williamson; M N Linver; F D Gilliland; C R Key
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  34 in total

1.  A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Steve Si Jia Feng; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.875

4.  Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Kristina Bliznakova; Xulei Qin; Baowei Fei; Steve Si Jia Feng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  On image quality metrics and the usefulness of grids in digital mammography.

Authors:  Han Chen; Mats Danielsson; Cheng Xu; Björn Cederström
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-02-17

8.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Alicia Toledano; Cosimo di Maggio; Enrica Baldan; Elisabetta Bezzon; Manuela La Grassa; Luigi Pescarini; Ilaria Polico; Alessandro Proietti; Aida Toffoli; Pier Carlo Muzzio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Evaluation of scatter effects on image quality for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Gang Wu; James G Mainprize; John M Boone; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.