Literature DB >> 31782046

Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks.

Renate D Savich1, Beth B Tigges2, Lisbeth Iglesias Rios3, Joanne McCloskey4, Kristine Tollestrup5, Robert D Annett6.   

Abstract

Use of biobanks for future genetic/genomic testing has increased. Biospecimens are increasingly being collected from infants/children; however, little is known about attitudes towards collection of biospecimens from postpartum women and their child. Using a hypothetical consent, this study investigated willingness to participate and attitudes, beliefs, and concerns related to consent materials requesting the biobanking genetic samples. A cross-sectional mixed methods design included women who reviewed a hypothetical consent related to biobanking genetic samples. Women were asked about their willingness to participate, followed by a focus group about biobanks and genetic/genomic testing. Post-focus group questionnaires assessed willingness to participate, the influence of study characteristics, and attitudes about genetic testing. Women (N = 37) were 29.0± 7.3 years of age (range 19-44); 51% had children and 28% were currently pregnant. A total of 46% were Hispanic (H), 38% were White non-Hispanic (WNH), and 16% were Native American (NA). Seventy-six percent (28/37) initially indicated that they would participate in the hypothetical study. Race and ethnicity impacted whether women would participate. Fewer NA women indicated that they would participate compared with H women and with WNH women (p < 0.02). Age, pregnancy status, having children, education level, insurance status, and income had no impact on participation decision and willingness to biobank specimens. NA and H women indicated that they were less likely than WNH women to agree to participate in a long-term biobank study. Given the importance of determining the genetic influence of health and disease, it is critical to attend to the questions and concerns of minority women regarding genetic studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biobank; Children; Genetic testing; Informed consent

Year:  2019        PMID: 31782046      PMCID: PMC7062944          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00446-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  40 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing.

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Toni Antonucci; John Van Hoewyk
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2004

2.  Perception of risk associated with asthma research procedures among adolescents, parents, and pediatricians.

Authors:  Robert D Annett; Janet L Brody; David G Scherer; Elizabeth A Perkett
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Comparisons of adolescent and parent willingness to participate in minimal and above-minimal risk pediatric asthma research protocols.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; Robert D Annett; David G Scherer; Mandy L Perryman; Keely M W Cofrin
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: the effects of adolescent gender and research risk.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; David G Scherer; Robert D Annett; Charles Turner; Jeanne Dalen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Assessing parental attitudes toward genetic testing for childhood hearing loss: before and after genetic consultation.

Authors:  Yuelin Li; Annie G Steinberg; Lisa Bain; Dinah Yaeger; Ari Bieler; Rachel Ewing; Girija Kaimal; Ian Krantz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  A new initiative on precision medicine.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Harold Varmus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Measuring trust in medical researchers.

Authors:  Mark A Hall; Fabian Camacho; Janice S Lawlor; Venita Depuy; Jeremy Sugarman; Kevin Weinfurt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.

Authors:  Amy A Lemke; Colin Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Opinions of Adolescents and Parents About Pediatric Biobanking.

Authors:  Cynthia C Kong; Tamsin E Tarling; Caron Strahlendorf; Michelle Dittrick; Suzanne M Vercauteren
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Information preferences of high literacy pregnant women regarding informed consent models for genetic carrier screening.

Authors:  K E Ormond; S Banuvar; A Daly; M Iris; J Minogue; S Elias
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11-14
View more
  2 in total

1.  A systematic literature review of Native American and Pacific Islanders' perspectives on health data privacy in the United States.

Authors:  Riley Taitingfong; Cinnamon S Bloss; Cynthia Triplett; Julie Cakici; Nanibaa' Garrison; Shelley Cole; Julie A Stoner; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Pediatric biorepository participation during the COVID-19 pandemic: predictors of enrollment and biospecimen donation.

Authors:  Anne M Neilan; Anisha Tyagi; Yao Tong; Eva J Farkas; Madeleine D Burns; Allison Fialkowski; Grace Park; Margot Hardcastle; Elizabeth Gootkind; Ingrid V Bassett; Fatma M Shebl; Lael M Yonker
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.125

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.