Literature DB >> 16868560

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.

Bartha Maria Knoppers1, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher.   

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed the emergence of international ethics guidelines discussing the importance of disclosing global and also, in certain circumstances, individual genetic research results to participants. This discussion is all the more important considering the advent of pharmacogenomics and the increasing incidence of 'translational' genetic research in the post-genomic era. We surveyed both the literature and the ethical guidelines using selective keywords. We then analyzed our data using a qualitative method approach and singled out countries or policies that were representative of certain positions. From our findings, we conclude that at the international level, there now exists an ethical duty to return individual genetic research results subject to the existence of proof of validity, significance and benefit. Even where these criteria are met, the right of the research participant not to know also has to be taken into consideration. The existence of an ethical duty to return individual genetic research results begs several other questions: Who should have the responsibility of disclosing such results and when? To whom should the results be disclosed? How? Finally, will this ethical 'imperative' become a legally recognized duty as well?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16868560     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  118 in total

Review 1.  To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Christenhusz; Koenraad Devriendt; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Biobanks: importance, implications and opportunities for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Alice K Hawkins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Incidental findings found in "healthy" volunteers during imaging performed for research: current legal and ethical implications.

Authors:  T C Booth; A Jackson; J M Wardlaw; S A Taylor; A D Waldman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A case of 3q29 microdeletion syndrome involving oral cleft inherited from a nonaffected mosaic parent: molecular analysis and ethical implications.

Authors:  Aline L Petrin; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Jamie L'Heureux; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-05-04

Review 5.  Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries.

Authors:  Nola M Ries; Jane LeGrandeur; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Sharing individual research results with biospecimen contributors: point.

Authors:  Rihab Yassin; Carol Weil; Nicole Lockhart
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Timothy Caulfield; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Changing perspectives in biobank research: from individual rights to concerns about public health regarding the return of results.

Authors:  Joanna Stjernschantz Forsberg; Mats G Hansson; Stefan Eriksson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Disclosure of genetic research results to members of a founder population.

Authors:  Rebecca L Anderson; Kathleen Murray; Jessica X Chong; Rebecca Ouwenga; Marina Antillon; Peixian Chen; Lorena Diaz de Leon; Kathryn J Swoboda; Lucille A Lester; Soma Das; Carole Ober; Darrel J Waggoner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Researcher and institutional review board perspectives on the benefits and challenges of reporting back biomonitoring and environmental exposure results.

Authors:  Jennifer Liss Ohayon; Elicia Cousins; Phil Brown; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Julia Green Brody
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 6.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.