Literature DB >> 20443953

Principles of human subjects protections applied in an opt-out, de-identified biobank.

Jill Pulley1, Ellen Clayton, Gordon R Bernard, Dan M Roden, Daniel R Masys.   

Abstract

BioVU, the Vanderbilt DNA Databank, is one of few biobanks that qualifies as non-human subjects research as determined by the local IRB and the federal Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP). BioVU accrues DNA samples extracted from leftover blood remaining from routine clinical testing. The resource is linked to a de-identified version of data extracted from an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system, termed the Synthetic Device (SD), in which all personal identifiers have been removed. Thus, there is no identifiable private information attached to the records. The Belmont Report enumerates the importance of the boundary between practice and research, and three principles: Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice, which constitute the essential ethical framework by which IRBs and ethics committees judge the risks and benefits of research involving human subjects. BioVU was developed by designing and implementing new procedures, for which there were no previously established methods, which are consistent with the principles of the Belmont Report. These included special oversight and governance, new informatics technologies, provisions to accommodate patients' preferences, as well as an extensive public education and communications component. Considerations of core principles and protections in the practical implementation of BioVU is the focus of this paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443953      PMCID: PMC3075971          DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00175.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


  18 in total

1.  The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think?

Authors:  Dave Wendler; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-08

2.  Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies.

Authors:  Cornelia Junghans; Gene Feder; Harry Hemingway; Adam Timmis; Melvyn Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-12

3.  Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?

Authors:  Donna T Chen; Donald L Rosenstein; Palaniappan Muthappan; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Franklin G Miller; Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

Review 4.  Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research.

Authors:  Jenny Hewison; Andy Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-05

5.  The obligation to participate in biomedical research.

Authors:  G Owen Schaefer; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Alan Wertheimer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Technical and policy approaches to balancing patient privacy and data sharing in clinical and translational research.

Authors:  Bradley Malin; David Karp; Richard H Scheuermann
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Maternal attitudes toward DNA collection for gene-environment studies: a qualitative research study.

Authors:  Mary M Jenkins; Erika Reed-Gross; Sonja A Rasmussen; Wanda D Barfield; Christine E Prue; Margaret L Gallagher; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank.

Authors:  Jill M Pulley; Margaret M Brace; Gordon R Bernard; Dan R Masys
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 1.522

10.  Parental consent for neuroimaging in paediatric research.

Authors:  Angela T Morgan; S Reilly; P Eadie; A Watts; C Simpson
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.508

View more
  125 in total

1.  Stem cell banking: between traceability and identifiability.

Authors:  Bartha M Knoppers; Rosario Isasi
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  A translational engine at the national scale: informatics for integrating biology and the bedside.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane; Susanne E Churchill; Shawn N Murphy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Genetics and cardiovascular disease: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Euan A Ashley; Ray E Hershberger; Colleen Caleshu; Patrick T Ellinor; Joe G N Garcia; David M Herrington; Carolyn Y Ho; Julie A Johnson; Steven J Kittner; Calum A Macrae; Gia Mudd-Martin; Daniel J Rader; Dan M Roden; Derek Scholes; Frank W Sellke; Jeffrey A Towbin; Jennifer Van Eyk; Bradford B Worrall
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Daniel R Morrison; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 5.  Electronic medical records as a tool in clinical pharmacology: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  D M Roden; H Xu; J C Denny; R A Wilke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Local ancestry transitions modify snp-trait associations.

Authors:  Alexandra E Fish; Dana C Crawford; John A Capra; William S Bush
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2018

7.  Enhancing uterine fibroid research through utilization of biorepositories linked to electronic medical record data.

Authors:  Lani Feingold-Link; Todd L Edwards; Sarah Jones; Katherine E Hartmann; Digna R Velez Edwards
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Genetic variation in the UGT1A locus is associated with simvastatin efficacy in a clinical practice setting.

Authors:  Otito F Iwuchukwu; QiPing Feng; Wei-Qi Wei; Lan Jiang; Min Jiang; Hua Xu; Joshua C Denny; Russell A Wilke; Ronald M Krauss; Dan M Roden; C Michael Stein
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  Features Associated With Discordance Between Pulmonary Arterial Wedge Pressure and Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure in Clinical Practice: Implications for Pulmonary Hypertension Classification.

Authors:  Anna R Hemnes; Alexander R Opotowsky; Tufik R Assad; Meng Xu; Laura N Doss; Eric Farber-Eger; Quinn S Wells; Evan L Brittain
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Enabling high-throughput genotype-phenotype associations in the Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment (EAGLE) project as part of the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study.

Authors:  William S Bush; Jonathan Boston; Sarah A Pendergrass; Logan Dumitrescu; Robert Goodloe; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Sarah Wilson; Bob McClellan; Eric Torstenson; Melissa A Basford; Kylee L Spencer; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.