Literature DB >> 24136750

'Mirroring' the ethics of biobanking: what should we learn from the analysis of consent documents[corrected]?

Jurate Serepkaite, Serepkaite Jurate1, Zivile Valuckiene, Valuckiene Zivile, Eugenijus Gefenas, Gefenas Eugenijus.   

Abstract

Biobanks have been recognized as a key research infrastructure and how to approach ethical questions has been a topic of discussion for at least a decade by now. This article explores the characteristics of donors' participation in European biobanks as reflected in the consent documents of a selection of different biobanks from various European countries. The primary aim of this study is to understand how donors are informed about their participation in biobanking. Also the paper discusses what the most important thematic issues of information are to be given to the biobank participants and how this information should be presented in the consent documents. For these purposes, we analyse consent documents from 14 biobanks in 11 countries for six ethically relevant issues: (1) model of consent, (2) scope of future research, (3) access to medical data, (4) feedback to the participants, (5) consent withdrawal, and (6) role of research ethics committee. In order to compare different trends of informing donors of human biological material and medical data, we interpret the six analysed issues in the context of respect to donor's autonomy paradigm. Although the results of the paper reflect the heterogeneity of biobank consent document policies applied in different European countries, we uncovered some trends and suggested several examples of good practices to balance the interests of the donors with those of the researchers and future patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24136750     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9481-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  9 in total

Review 1.  Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases.

Authors:  R Chadwick; K Berg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.

Authors:  Annelien L Bredenoord; Hester Y Kroes; Edwin Cuppen; Michael Parker; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 3.  How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study.

Authors:  G Helgesson; J Ludvigsson; U Gustafsson Stolt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Donors perceptions of consent to and feedback from biobank research: time to acknowledge diversity?

Authors:  K Hoeyer
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Biobanking in pediatrics: the human nonsubjects approach.

Authors:  Kyle Bertram Brothers
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 6.  Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Ruth Chadwick
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Yann Joly; Jacques Simard; Francine Durocher
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 8.  Biobanking for better healthcare.

Authors:  Peter H J Riegman; Manuel M Morente; Fay Betsou; Pasquale de Blasio; Peter Geary
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.

Authors:  F A Miller; R Christensen; M Giacomini; J S Robert
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.903

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Using a participatory approach to develop and implement the UK ME/CFS Biobank.

Authors:  Eliana M Lacerda; Caroline C Kingdon; Erinna W Bowman; Luis Nacul
Journal:  Fatigue       Date:  2017-10-30

2.  "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.

Authors:  Keymanthri Moodley; Shenuka Singh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Social and Communicative Functions of Informed Consent Forms in East Asia and Beyond.

Authors:  Go Yoshizawa; Teguh H Sasongko; Chih-Hsing Ho; Kazuto Kato
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  The social dimension of biobanking: objectives and challenges.

Authors:  E V Bryzgalina; K Y Alasania; T A Varkhotov; S M Gavrilenko; E M Shkomova
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2017-09-13

5.  Contextual Exceptionalism After Death: An Information Ethics Approach to Post-Mortem Privacy in Health Data Research.

Authors:  Marieke A R Bak; Dick L Willems
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.777

6.  Towards a Design Toolkit of Informed Consent Models Across Fields: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Iris Loosman; Philip J Nickel
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.777

7.  Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents.

Authors:  Nchangwi Syntia Munung; Patricia Marshall; Megan Campbell; Katherine Littler; Francis Masiye; Odile Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer; Janet Seeley; D J Stein; Paulina Tindana; Jantina de Vries
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Stakeholders' perspectives on the post-mortem use of genetic and health-related data for research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marieke A R Bak; M Corrette Ploem; Hakan Ateşyürek; Marieke T Blom; Hanno L Tan; Dick L Willems
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.246

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.