Literature DB >> 16575896

Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Ebony B Bookman1, Aleisha A Langehorne, John H Eckfeldt, Kathleen C Glass, Gail P Jarvik, Michael Klag, Greg Koski, Arno Motulsky, Benjamin Wilfond, Teri A Manolio, Richard R Fabsitz, Russell V Luepker.   

Abstract

Prospective epidemiologic studies aid in identifying genetic variants associated with diseases, health risks, and physiologic traits. These genetic variants may eventually be measured clinically for purposes of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. As evidence of the potential clinical value of such information accrues, research studies face growing pressure to report these results to study participants or their physicians, even before sufficient evidence is available to support widespread screening of asymptomatic persons. There is thus a need to begin to develop consensus on whether and when genetic findings should be reported to participants in research studies. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) convened a Working Group on Reporting Genetic Results in Research Studies to discuss if, when, and how genetic information should be reported to study participants. The Working Group concluded that genetic test results should be reported to study participants when the associated risk for the disease is significant; the disease has important health implications such as premature death or substantial morbidity or has significant reproductive implications; and proven therapeutic or preventive interventions are available. Finally, the Working Group recommended procedures for reporting genetic research results and encouraged increased efforts to create uniform guidelines for this activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16575896      PMCID: PMC2556074          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  32 in total

1.  Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Eric Kodish; Charles Weijer
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 May-Jun

2.  Importance of informed consent in offering to return research results to research participants.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Eric Kodish; Charles Weijer
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  2003-12

3.  Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Bert-Ove Olofsson; Tom Mjörndal; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Genetic testing: hope or hype?

Authors:  Charles J Epstein
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  10 most commonly asked questions about genetic testing.

Authors:  Ami R Rosen
Journal:  Neurologist       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.398

6.  Physicians' perceived usefulness of and satisfaction with test reports for cystic fibrosis (DeltaF508) and factor V Leiden.

Authors:  Marie Krousel-Wood; Hans C Andersson; Janet Rice; Kelly E Jackson; Eunice R Rosner; Ira M Lubin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Eric Kodish; Susan Shurin; Charles Weijer
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.289

8.  Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding offering clinical trial results to study participants.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Nadia Hackett; Emily Blood; Rebecca Gelman; Steven Joffe; Susan Bauer-Wu; Katherine Knudsen; Karen Emmons; Deborah Collyar; Richard L Schilsky; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Predictive genetic testing in urology: ethical and social issues.

Authors:  Maxwell J Mehlman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Human genetics, environment, and communities of color: ethical and social implications.

Authors:  Julie Sze; Swati Prakash
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  113 in total

1.  Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; R Jean Cadigan; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Gail E Henderson; Marsha Michie; Daniel K Nelson; Holly K Tabor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Marsha Michie; Gail Henderson; Arlene M Davis; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.

Authors:  Christopher A Cassa; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Kristen N Linney; Rodney A Radtke; Erin L Heinzen; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  A case of 3q29 microdeletion syndrome involving oral cleft inherited from a nonaffected mosaic parent: molecular analysis and ethical implications.

Authors:  Aline L Petrin; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Jamie L'Heureux; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-05-04

6.  Using the optimal receiver operating characteristic curve to design a predictive genetic test, exemplified with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Qing Lu; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  Genetics of the Framingham Heart Study population.

Authors:  Diddahally R Govindaraju; L Adrienne Cupples; William B Kannel; Christopher J O'Donnell; Larry D Atwood; Ralph B D'Agostino; Caroline S Fox; Marty Larson; Daniel Levy; Joanne Murabito; Ramachandran S Vasan; Greta Lee Splansky; Philip A Wolf; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.944

8.  Disclosure of genetic research results to members of a founder population.

Authors:  Rebecca L Anderson; Kathleen Murray; Jessica X Chong; Rebecca Ouwenga; Marina Antillon; Peixian Chen; Lorena Diaz de Leon; Kathryn J Swoboda; Lucille A Lester; Soma Das; Carole Ober; Darrel J Waggoner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.

Authors:  Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Jonathan S Berg; Kyle Brothers; Ellen W Clayton; Wendy Chung; Barbara J Evans; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Carlos J Gallego; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Stacy W Gray; Ingrid A Holm; Iftikhar J Kullo; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Cathy McCarty; Cynthia A Prows; Heidi L Rehm; Richard R Sharp; Joseph Salama; Saskia Sanderson; Sara L Van Driest; Marc S Williams; Susan M Wolf; Wendy A Wolf; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants.

Authors:  Kristin M Kostick; Cody Brannan; Stacey Pereira; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.