Literature DB >> 21688939

When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes.

Melissa L-H Võ1, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

One might assume that familiarity with a scene or previous encounters with objects embedded in a scene would benefit subsequent search for those items. However, in a series of experiments we show that this is not the case: When participants were asked to subsequently search for multiple objects in the same scene, search performance remained essentially unchanged over the course of searches despite increasing scene familiarity. Similarly, looking at target objects during previews, which included letter search, 30 seconds of free viewing, or even 30 seconds of memorizing a scene, also did not benefit search for the same objects later on. However, when the same object was searched for again memory for the previous search was capable of producing very substantial speeding of search despite many different intervening searches. This was especially the case when the previous search engagement had been active rather than supported by a cue. While these search benefits speak to the strength of memory-guided search when the same search target is repeated, the lack of memory guidance during initial object searches-despite previous encounters with the target objects-demonstrates the dominance of guidance by generic scene knowledge in real-world search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21688939      PMCID: PMC3969238          DOI: 10.1037/a0024147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  46 in total

1.  Searching for one versus two identical targets: when visual search has a memory.

Authors:  B S Gibson; L Li; E Skow; K Brown; L Cooke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

2.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Chelsea Heaven
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Panoramic search: the interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene.

Authors:  Aude Oliva; Jeremy M Wolfe; Helga C Arsenio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory.

Authors:  Mathew S Peterson; Melissa R Beck; Miroslava Vomela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-01

6.  The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-02

7.  Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  What you see is what you need.

Authors:  Jochen Triesch; Dana H Ballard; Mary M Hayhoe; Brian T Sullivan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  33 in total

1.  Priorities for representation: Task settings and object interaction both influence object memory.

Authors:  Clare Kirtley; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

2.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects.

Authors:  Emilie L Josephs; Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2016-06-03

Review 5.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

6.  Enhancing long-term memory with stimulation tunes visual attention in one trial.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

Review 8.  Informatics in radiology: what can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images?

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Karla Evans; Melissa L-H Võ; Francine L Jacobson; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; George A Alvarez; Ruth Rosenholtz; Yoana I Kuzmova; Ashley M Sherman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.