Literature DB >> 29184115

Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Dejan Draschkow1, Melissa L-H Võ2.   

Abstract

Predictions of environmental rules (here referred to as "scene grammar") can come in different forms: seeing a toilet in a living room would violate semantic predictions, while finding a toilet brush next to the toothpaste would violate syntactic predictions. The existence of such predictions has usually been investigated by showing observers images containing such grammatical violations. Conversely, the generative process of creating an environment according to one's scene grammar and its effects on behavior and memory has received little attention. In a virtual reality paradigm, we either instructed participants to arrange objects according to their scene grammar or against it. Subsequently, participants' memory for the arrangements was probed using a surprise recall (Exp1), or repeated search (Exp2) task. As a result, participants' construction behavior showed strategic use of larger, static objects to anchor the location of smaller objects which are generally the goals of everyday actions. Further analysis of this scene construction data revealed possible commonalities between the rules governing word usage in language and object usage in naturalistic environments. Taken together, we revealed some of the building blocks of scene grammar necessary for efficient behavior, which differentially influence how we interact with objects and what we remember about scenes.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29184115      PMCID: PMC5705766          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16739-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  45 in total

1.  Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Anurag Shrivastava; Ryan Mruczek; Jeff B Pelz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  A pool of pairs of related objects (POPORO) for investigating visual semantic integration: behavioral and electrophysiological validation.

Authors:  Lyudmyla Y Kovalenko; Maximilien Chaumon; Niko A Busch
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  Spatial cognition and the brain.

Authors:  Neil Burgess
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Semantic preview benefit during reading.

Authors:  Sven Hohenstein; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The influence of instructions on object memory in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Sarah L Tatler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.

Authors:  G R Loftus; N H Mackworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Scene consistency in object and background perception.

Authors:  Jodi L Davenport; Mary C Potter
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-08

Review 10.  Discovering your inner Gibson: reconciling action-specific and ecological approaches to perception-action.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Control of gaze in natural environments: effects of rewards and costs, uncertainty and memory in target selection.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Jonathan Samir Matthis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Disrupted object-scene semantics boost scene recall but diminish object recall in drawings from memory.

Authors:  Wilma A Bainbridge; Wan Y Kwok; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-05-24

3.  Memory shapes visual search strategies in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Chia-Ling Li; M Pilar Aivar; Matthew H Tong; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Facilitation of allocentric coding by virtue of object-semantics.

Authors:  Harun Karimpur; Yaniv Morgenstern; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Get Your Guidance Going: Investigating the Activation of Spatial Priors for Efficient Search in Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Julia Beitner; Jason Helbing; Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melvin Kallmayer; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Functional biases in attentional templates from associative memory.

Authors:  Sage E P Boettcher; Freek van Ede; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Keeping it real: Looking beyond capacity limits in visual cognition.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Dejan Draschkow
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Extra-foveal Processing of Object Semantics Guides Early Overt Attention During Visual Search.

Authors:  Francesco Cimminella; Sergio Della Sala; Moreno I Coco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Multiple spatial frames for immersive working memory.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Anna C Nobre; Freek van Ede
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.