Literature DB >> 19757963

Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.

Melissa L-H Võ1, John M Henderson.   

Abstract

It has been shown that attention and eye movements during scene perception are preferentially allocated to semantically inconsistent objects compared to their consistent controls. However, there has been a dispute over how early during scene viewing such inconsistencies are detected. In the study presented here, we introduced syntactic object-scene inconsistencies (i.e., floating objects) in addition to semantic inconsistencies to investigate the degree to which they attract attention during scene viewing. In Experiment 1 participants viewed scenes in preparation for a subsequent memory task, while in Experiment 2 participants were instructed to search for target objects. In neither experiment were we able to find evidence for extrafoveal detection of either type of inconsistency. However, upon fixation both semantically and syntactically inconsistent objects led to increased object processing as seen in elevated gaze durations and number of fixations. Interestingly, the semantic inconsistency effect was diminished for floating objects, which suggests an interaction of semantic and syntactic scene processing. This study is the first to provide evidence for the influence of syntactic in addition to semantic object-scene inconsistencies on eye movement behavior during real-world scene viewing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757963     DOI: 10.1167/9.3.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  44 in total

1.  Perceiving the tree in the woods: segregating brain responses to stimuli constituting natural scenes.

Authors:  Ulla Martens; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The attraction of visual attention to texts in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Hsueh-Cheng Wang; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Alexander C Berg; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Cat and mouse search: the influence of scene and object analysis on eye movements when targets change locations during search.

Authors:  Anne P Hillstrom; Joice D Segabinazi; Hayward J Godwin; Simon P Liversedge; Valerie Benson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

7.  Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; George A Alvarez; Ruth Rosenholtz; Yoana I Kuzmova; Ashley M Sherman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Surprise attracts the eyes and binds the gaze.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann; Arvid Herwig
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

9.  How the presence of persons biases eye movements.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

10.  Age doesn't matter much: hybrid visual and memory search is preserved in older adults.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2019-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.