Literature DB >> 12678628

What you see is what you need.

Jochen Triesch1, Dana H Ballard, Mary M Hayhoe, Brian T Sullivan.   

Abstract

We studied the role of attention and task demands for implicit change detection. Subjects engaged in an object sorting task performed in a virtual reality environment, where we changed the properties of an object while the subject was manipulating it. The task assures that subjects are looking at the changed object immediately before and after the change. Our results demonstrate that in this situation subjects' ability to notice changes to the object strongly depends on momentary task demands. Surprisingly, frequent noticing is not guaranteed by task relevance of the changed object attribute per se, but the changed object attribute needs to be task relevant at exactly the right times. Also, the simplicity of the used objects indicates that change blindness occurs in situations where the visual short term memory load is minimal, suggesting a potential dissociation between short term memory limitations and change blindness. Finally, we found that changes may even go unnoticed if subjects are visually tracking the object at the moment of change. Our experiments suggest a highly purposive and task specific nature of human vision, where information extracted from the fixation point is used for certain computations only "just in time" when needed to solve the current goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12678628     DOI: 10.1167/3.1.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  46 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Priorities for representation: Task settings and object interaction both influence object memory.

Authors:  Clare Kirtley; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

3.  Sources of variability in interceptive movements.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Michael F Land
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Apparent motion during saccadic suppression periods.

Authors:  Robert Scott Allison; Jens Schumacher; Shabnam Sadr; Rainer Herpers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Testing effects in visual short-term memory: The case of an object's size.

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

Review 8.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Reading as active sensing: a computational model of gaze planning in word recognition.

Authors:  Marcello Ferro; Dimitri Ognibene; Giovanni Pezzulo; Vito Pirrelli
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Task-specific modulation of memory for object features in natural scenes.

Authors:  Alan Robinson; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.