Literature DB >> 23177141

The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Melissa L-H Võ1, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

It seems intuitive to think that previous exposure or interaction with an environment should make it easier to search through it and, no doubt, this is true in many real-world situations. However, in a recent study, we demonstrated that previous exposure to a scene does not necessarily speed search within that scene. For instance, when observers performed as many as 15 searches for different objects in the same, unchanging scene, the speed of search did not decrease much over the course of these multiple searches (Võ & Wolfe, 2012). Only when observers were asked to search for the same object again did search become considerably faster. We argued that our naturalistic scenes provided such strong "semantic" guidance-e.g., knowing that a faucet is usually located near a sink-that guidance by incidental episodic memory-having seen that faucet previously-was rendered less useful. Here, we directly manipulated the availability of semantic information provided by a scene. By monitoring observers' eye movements, we found a tight coupling of semantic and episodic memory guidance: Decreasing the availability of semantic information increases the use of episodic memory to guide search. These findings have broad implications regarding the use of memory during search in general and particularly during search in naturalistic scenes.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23177141      PMCID: PMC3928147          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  47 in total

1.  Search for multiple targets: remember the targets, forget the search.

Authors:  T S Horowitz; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

2.  In search of remembrance: evidence for memory in visual search.

Authors:  A Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

3.  Visual search has memory.

Authors:  M S Peterson; A F Kramer; R F Wang; D E Irwin; J S McCarley
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

4.  To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; C C Williams; J M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

5.  The time course of abstract visual representation.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Iain D Gilchrist; Jenny Rusted
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 6.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Learning 10,000 pictures.

Authors:  L Standing
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search.

Authors:  I D Gilchrist; M Harvey
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  29 in total

1.  Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Object grouping based on real-world regularities facilitates perception by reducing competitive interactions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Timo Stein; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Meaning in learning: Contextual cueing relies on objects' visual features and not on objects' meaning.

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

Review 4.  Attention in the real world: toward understanding its neural basis.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L H Võ
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Hippocampal contribution to implicit configuration memory expressed via eye movements during scene exploration.

Authors:  Anthony J Ryals; Jane X Wang; Kelly L Polnaszek; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 7.  The role of memory for visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa Le-Hoa Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  What is a preattentive feature?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Igor S Utochkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-13

9.  Visual working memory modulates low-level saccade target selection: evidence from rapidly generated saccades in the global effect paradigm.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: comment on Võ and Wolfe (2012).

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.