Literature DB >> 18787113

Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Timothy F Brady1, Talia Konkle, George A Alvarez, Aude Oliva.   

Abstract

One of the major lessons of memory research has been that human memory is fallible, imprecise, and subject to interference. Thus, although observers can remember thousands of images, it is widely assumed that these memories lack detail. Contrary to this assumption, here we show that long-term memory is capable of storing a massive number of objects with details from the image. Participants viewed pictures of 2,500 objects over the course of 5.5 h. Afterward, they were shown pairs of images and indicated which of the two they had seen. The previously viewed item could be paired with either an object from a novel category, an object of the same basic-level category, or the same object in a different state or pose. Performance in each of these conditions was remarkably high (92%, 88%, and 87%, respectively), suggesting that participants successfully maintained detailed representations of thousands of images. These results have implications for cognitive models, in which capacity limitations impose a primary computational constraint (e.g., models of object recognition), and pose a challenge to neural models of memory storage and retrieval, which must be able to account for such a large and detailed storage capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18787113      PMCID: PMC2533687          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803390105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

Review 1.  How big is human memory, or on being just useful enough.

Authors:  Y Dudai
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent.

Authors:  M J Tarr; P Williams; W G Hayward; I Gauthier
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Memory's echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex.

Authors:  M E Wheeler; S E Petersen; R L Buckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The neural origins of specific and general memory: the role of the fusiform cortex.

Authors:  Rachel J Garoff; Scott D Slotnick; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Reading and visual memory: remembering scenes that were never seen.

Authors:  H Intraub; J E Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1992

7.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Change blindness.

Authors:  D J Simons; D T Levin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Visual categorization and object representation in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  N Sigala; F Gabbiani; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  214 in total

1.  Scene memory is more detailed than you think: the role of categories in visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Timothy F Brady; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-10-04

2.  Long-term memory prepares neural activity for perception.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Kathryn Atherton; Eva Zita Patai; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Semantic congruency but not temporal synchrony enhances long-term memory performance for audio-visual scenes.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Markus Huff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

4.  Forgetting induced by recognition of visual images.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-07

5.  Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness.

Authors:  Gary Lupyan; Emily J Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Suppressed Sensory Response to Predictable Object Stimuli throughout the Ventral Visual Stream.

Authors:  David Richter; Matthias Ekman; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The role of scene summary statistics in object recognition.

Authors:  Tim Lauer; Tim H W Cornelissen; Dejan Draschkow; Verena Willenbockel; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Long-term associative memory capacity in man.

Authors:  Joel L Voss
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.