Literature DB >> 27270227

Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects.

Emilie L Josephs1, Dejan Draschkow2, Jeremy M Wolfe3,4, Melissa L-H Võ2.   

Abstract

Previous work has shown that recall of objects that are incidentally encountered as targets in visual search is better than recall of objects that have been intentionally memorized (Draschkow, Wolfe, & Võ, 2014). However, this counter-intuitive result is not seen when these tasks are performed with non-scene stimuli. The goal of the current paper is to determine what features of search in a scene contribute to higher recall rates when compared to a memorization task. In each of four experiments, we compare the free recall rate for target objects following a search to the rate following a memorization task. Across the experiments, the stimuli include progressively more scene-related information. Experiment 1 provides the spatial relations between objects. Experiment 2 adds relative size and depth of objects. Experiments 3 and 4 include scene layout and semantic information. We find that search leads to better recall than explicit memorization in cases where scene layout and semantic information are present, as long as the participant has ample time (2500ms) to integrate this information with knowledge about the target object (Exp. 4). These results suggest that the integration of scene and target information not only leads to more efficient search, but can also contribute to stronger memory representations than intentional memorization.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incidental memory; Integration time; Object recall; Repeated search; Scene gist; Scene perception; Semantic guidance; Task effects

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27270227      PMCID: PMC4987188          DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  35 in total

1.  The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Chelsea Heaven
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped.

Authors:  Collin Green; John E Hummel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Task and context determine where you look.

Authors:  Constantin A Rothkopf; Dana H Ballard; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The influence of instructions on object memory in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Sarah L Tatler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Contextual integration of visual objects necessitates attention.

Authors:  Nurit Gronau; Meytal Shachar
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L-H Võ; Karla K Evans; Michelle R Greene
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Scene consistency in object and background perception.

Authors:  Jodi L Davenport; Mary C Potter
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-08

9.  Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: comment on Võ and Wolfe (2012).

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Making Sense of Real-World Scenes.

Authors:  George L Malcolm; Iris I A Groen; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Similar mechanisms of temporary bindings for identity and location of objects in healthy ageing: an eye-tracking study with naturalistic scenes.

Authors:  Giorgia D'Innocenzo; Sergio Della Sala; Moreno I Coco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  The Changing Landscape: High-Level Influences on Eye Movement Guidance in Scenes.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; Monica S Castelhano
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-28

5.  Keeping it real: Looking beyond capacity limits in visual cognition.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Dejan Draschkow
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.