Literature DB >> 24018727

Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Benjamin W Tatler1, Yoriko Hirose, Sarah K Finnegan, Riina Pievilainen, Clare Kirtley, Alan Kennedy.   

Abstract

Selecting and remembering visual information is an active and competitive process. In natural environments, representations are tightly coupled to task. Objects that are task-relevant are remembered better due to a combination of increased selection for fixation and strategic control of encoding and/or retaining viewed information. However, it is not understood how physically manipulating objects when performing a natural task influences priorities for selection and memory. In this study, we compare priorities for selection and memory when actively engaged in a natural task with first-person observation of the same object manipulations. Results suggest that active manipulation of a task-relevant object results in a specific prioritization for object position information compared with other properties and compared with action observation of the same manipulations. Experiment 2 confirms that this spatial prioritization is likely to arise from manipulation rather than differences in spatial representation in real environments and the movies used for action observation. Thus, our findings imply that physical manipulation of task relevant objects results in a specific prioritization of spatial information about task-relevant objects, possibly coupled with strategic de-prioritization of colour memory for irrelevant objects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action; fixation; memory; natural task; priority; video

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24018727      PMCID: PMC3758208          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  44 in total

1.  How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Sven Hohenstein; Ming Yan; Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 2.  Spatial cognition and the brain.

Authors:  Neil Burgess
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex.

Authors:  J P Gottlieb; M Kusunoki; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  What you see is what you need.

Authors:  Jochen Triesch; Dana H Ballard; Mary M Hayhoe; Brian T Sullivan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  The role of the lateral intraparietal area in orienting attention and its implications for visual search.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Koorosh Mirpour; Fabrice Arcizet; Wei S Ong
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 6.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Mary M Hayhoe; Michael F Land; Dana H Ballard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: comment on Võ and Wolfe (2012).

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Oculocentric spatial representation in parietal cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby; J R Duhamel; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  From observation to action simulation: the role of attention, eye-gaze, emotion, and body state.

Authors:  Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  8 in total

1.  Priorities for representation: Task settings and object interaction both influence object memory.

Authors:  Clare Kirtley; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

2.  Attentional selection in visual perception, memory and action: a quest for cross-domain integration.

Authors:  Werner X Schneider; Wolfgang Einhäuser; Gernot Horstmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Multilevel Differences in Spontaneous Social Attention in Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Katarzyna Chawarska; Saier Ye; Frederick Shic; Lisha Chen
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2015-12-19

5.  Adapting the coordination of eyes and head to differences in task and environment during fully-mobile visual exploration.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Brianna McGee; Gabrielle Blanch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A cognitive ethology study of first- and third-person perspectives.

Authors:  Joseph D Chisholm; Craig S Chapman; Marvin Amm; Walter F Bischof; Dan Smilek; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Action perception as hypothesis testing.

Authors:  Francesco Donnarumma; Marcello Costantini; Ettore Ambrosini; Karl Friston; Giovanni Pezzulo
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Keeping it real: Looking beyond capacity limits in visual cognition.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Dejan Draschkow
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.