DinB (DNA Pol IV) is a translesion (TLS) DNA polymerase, which inserts a nucleotide opposite an otherwise replication-stalling N(2)-dG lesion in vitro, and confers resistance to nitrofurazone (NFZ), a compound that forms these lesions in vivo. DinB is also known to be part of the cellular response to alkylation DNA damage. Yet it is not known if DinB active site residues, in addition to aminoacids involved in DNA synthesis, are critical in alkylation lesion bypass. It is also unclear which active site aminoacids, if any, might modulate DinB's bypass fidelity of distinct lesions. Here we report that along with the classical catalytic residues, an active site "aromatic triad", namely residues F12, F13, and Y79, is critical for cell survival in the presence of the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Strains expressing dinB alleles with single point mutations in the aromatic triad survive poorly in MMS. Remarkably, these strains show fewer MMS- than NFZ-induced mutants, suggesting that the aromatic triad, in addition to its role in TLS, modulates DinB's accuracy in bypassing distinct lesions. The high bypass fidelity of prevalent alkylation lesions is evident even when the DinB active site performs error-prone NFZ-induced lesion bypass. The analyses carried out with the active site aromatic triad suggest that the DinB active site residues are poised to proficiently bypass distinctive DNA lesions, yet they are also malleable so that the accuracy of the bypass is lesion-dependent.
DinB (DNA Pol IV) is a translesion (TLS) DNA polymerase, which inserts a nucleotide opposite an otherwise replication-stalling N(2)-dG lesion in vitro, and confers resistance to nitrofurazone (NFZ), a compound that forms these lesions in vivo. DinB is also known to be part of the cellular response to alkylation DNA damage. Yet it is not known if DinB active site residues, in addition to aminoacids involved in DNA synthesis, are critical in alkylation lesion bypass. It is also unclear which active site aminoacids, if any, might modulate DinB's bypass fidelity of distinct lesions. Here we report that along with the classical catalytic residues, an active site "aromatic triad", namely residues F12, F13, and Y79, is critical for cell survival in the presence of the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Strains expressing dinB alleles with single point mutations in the aromatic triad survive poorly in MMS. Remarkably, these strains show fewer MMS- than NFZ-induced mutants, suggesting that the aromatic triad, in addition to its role in TLS, modulates DinB's accuracy in bypassing distinct lesions. The high bypass fidelity of prevalent alkylation lesions is evident even when the DinB active site performs error-prone NFZ-induced lesion bypass. The analyses carried out with the active site aromatic triad suggest that the DinB active site residues are poised to proficiently bypass distinctive DNA lesions, yet they are also malleable so that the accuracy of the bypass is lesion-dependent.
Replicative DNA polymerases are multi-protein complexes responsible for synthesizing
a high fidelity copy of a cell's genome. Persistent lesions on the template
DNA, which DNA repair pathways have failed to recognize, result in stalling of DNA
replication, a potentially lethal event [1]. To avoid lethality,
specialized DNA polymerases insert deoxynucleotides (dNTPs) opposite
replication-blocking DNA lesions in a process known as translesion synthesis (TLS).
This is largely a low fidelity process usually resulting in elevated mutagenesis
[1], [2]. In
Escherichia coli there are three TLS polymerases that are
regulated by the SOS gene network, one of the cellular responses to DNA damage and
environmental stress [1], [3]. The polB gene encodes the B family DNA
Pol II, while the dinB gene and the umuDC operon
encode the two Y family DNA polymerases, DNA Pol IV and DNA Pol V respectively [1], [4], [5], [6], [7]. DinB is of
particular interest because of its evolutionary conservation [1], [6], [8] and its high basal intracellular
concentration (∼250 nM) [1], [9], [10]. Indeed, this is approximately 17 fold higher [10] than that of DNA
Pol III complex (the replicative DNA polymerase, 15 nM; [9]) and is similar to that of the
processivity clamp (β-clamp, 250 nM; [11], [12]), an essential replication
factor known to both recruit all DNA polymerases to the replication fork and manage
their activity in the cell [13], [14].E.coli cells lacking the dinB gene
(ΔdinB) are sensitive to nitrofurazone (NFZ) and
4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) [15], [16], reagents that create persistent DNA lesions on the
N group of deoxyguanosine
(N-dG) [17], [18]. Recent evidence suggests
that DinB and its homologues can also perform TLS of lesions that are the product of
alkylation of DNA bases [19], [20], [21]. Alkylating agents are both a byproduct of the
cell's metabolism and also come from diverse exogenous sources generating DNA
damage in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells [1], [22], [23], [24], [25]. In addition, alkylating agents
are used as anti-cancer chemotherapeutic agents, [1], [26], [27], underscoring the
significance of understanding the cellular mechanisms of alkylation lesion
tolerance.It is known that base excision repair pathways are the primary cellular response to
alkylation damage [1], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], though Y family DNA polymerases are also part of this
response [1],
[19], [20], [21]. These
polymerases likely bypass 3-methyladenine (3-meA; [1], [19], [20], [21], [33], [34]), a prevalent alkylation lesion
that persists on the DNA and brings about replication fork stalling and cell death
[20], [21], [35], [36]. Indeed,
E. coli strains lacking the dinB gene
(ΔdinB) are sensitive to several alkylating agents, such as
methyl methanesulfonate (MMS; [19]). Similar sensitivity is found in eukaryotic cells
deficient in TLS polymerases [20], [21]. Thus, the evidence so far indicates that if DNA repair
pathways do not effectively recognize 3-meA, Y family DNA polymerases are critical
in the cell's response to alkylation damage [19], [20], [21]. Unfortunately, 3-meA has a
very short in vitro half-life [21], [37], making difficult to directly
investigate the bypass mechanisms of this alkylation lesion.Most of our knowledge in regard to the active site of DinB has been acquired through
studies with reagents that generate N-dG lesions [15], [16]. However, it is
not known which aminoacids in the DinB active site are important for the bypass of
alkylation lesions, e.g. most likely 3-meA. It is also unclear whether the same
active site residues are involved in the bypass or its fidelity of both alkylation
and N-dG lesions. Structural modeling predicts that Pol
κ (the mammalianDinB homologue) could accommodate either the
N-dG or 3-meA minor groove adducts in its
active site in a conformation that would allow both insertion and extension from
either adduct [20].We studied a triad of aromatic residues (Fig. 1) that is conserved in Y family DNA polymerases including Pol
η and Pol κ [38], [39] and used as a control the strictly catalytic aspartic
acid 103 (D103). This is known to be critical for DNA synthesis and thus unable to
complement a ΔdinB strain [16], [40], [41]. Here, we describe the analysis
of the aromatic triad residues of DinB in response to DNA damage generated by
treatment with MMS or NFZ, reagents that create respectively alkylation or
N-dG lesions in vivo. This
report describes the effect of changing the aromatic triad residues to those of
different polarity or size on both survival and DNA damage-induced mutagenesis. This
type of analysis has permitted us to learn about the intricacies of in
vivo DinB lesion bypass activities. We infer that the classical
catalytic and the highly conserved DinB active site “aromatic triad” are
necessary for TLS of alkylation lesions. Remarkably, the aromatic triad also serves
the function of governing in vivo TLS fidelity, which seems to be
lesion-dependent.
Figure 1
Homologous E. coli DinB and human Pol κ aromatic
triads appear similarly positioned in the active site.
The near identical conformation of the aromatic triads of (A)
DinB (Pol IV) (F12, F13 and Y79) and (B) Pol κ (F111, Y112,
and Y174) suggests these residues could be required for TLS activity of Pol
κ. The DinB structure is from an in silico model
generated in collaboration with A. Abyzov and V. Ilyin [40]. Image generated using
PyMOL (DeLano, W.L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (2002) DeLano
Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA.). Pol κ structure was rendered using
the pdb 3IN5 with PyMOL.
Homologous E. coli DinB and human Pol κ aromatic
triads appear similarly positioned in the active site.
The near identical conformation of the aromatic triads of (A)
DinB (Pol IV) (F12, F13 and Y79) and (B) Pol κ (F111, Y112,
and Y174) suggests these residues could be required for TLS activity of Pol
κ. The DinB structure is from an in silico model
generated in collaboration with A. Abyzov and V. Ilyin [40]. Image generated using
PyMOL (DeLano, W.L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (2002) DeLano
Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA.). Pol κ structure was rendered using
the pdb 3IN5 with PyMOL.
Results
DinB active site residues are important for survival in MMS
The two catalytic activities of DinB, phosphodiester bond formation (i.e. DNA
synthesis) and lesion bypass are separable [16]. Each activity can be
tested in vivo by measuring survival of cells lacking the
chromosomal copy of the dinB gene (ΔdinB)
after treatment with a DNA damaging agent. Because some alkylation lesions are
chemically unstable (e.g. 3-meA), we took advantage of this genetic approach to
determine whether ΔdinB cells expressing plasmid-borne
dinB alleles with mutations in the aromatic triad could
survive MMS treatment.Low copy number plasmids expressing different dinB alleles from
the native SOS inducible promoter were introduced into
ΔdinB by transformation (Table S1).
Cells were then assayed for survival at various concentrations of MMS. As
expected, the plasmid carrying native dinB
rescues ΔdinB treated with MMS (Figs. S1
and 2), while the strain
expressing the catalytically inactive dinB(D103N) variant [41] is highly
sensitive to MMS treatment (Figs. S1 and 2). Unexpectedly, ΔdinB
cells expressing dinB(F13V) did not show the prototypical
highly NFZ sensitive phenotype [16] upon treatment with MMS (Figs. S1
and 2).
Figure 2
ΔdinB is rescued from MMS and NFZ lethality only
by dinB
+
(A) Neither
plasmid-borne DinB(D103N) nor DinB(F13V) rescue
ΔdinB cells treated with MMS (7.5 mM) or NFZ
(0.008 mM). Enhanced sensitivity to MMS is observed in
ΔdinB with DinB(D103N) (gray bars).
ΔdinB strains with either DinB(F13V) or
DinB(D103N) variants exhibit an enhanced cellular sensitivity to NFZ
compared to ΔdinB (pVector, white bars) as
previously reported [16]. Error bars represent the standard deviation
of the mean from at least 3 independent experiments.
ΔdinB is rescued from MMS and NFZ lethality only
by dinB
+
(A) Neither
plasmid-borne DinB(D103N) nor DinB(F13V) rescue
ΔdinB cells treated with MMS (7.5 mM) or NFZ
(0.008 mM). Enhanced sensitivity to MMS is observed in
ΔdinB with DinB(D103N) (gray bars).
ΔdinB strains with either DinB(F13V) or
DinB(D103N) variants exhibit an enhanced cellular sensitivity to NFZ
compared to ΔdinB (pVector, white bars) as
previously reported [16]. Error bars represent the standard deviation
of the mean from at least 3 independent experiments.We were intrigued by the enhanced cellular sensitivity to MMS
(ΔdinB with the dinB(D103N), gray
bars; Fig. 2) or NFZ
(ΔdinB with either the dinB(D103N) or
dinB(F13V), white bars; Fig. 2) compared to
ΔdinB. The simplest explanation is that the phenotype
is due to high DinB intracellular concentrations, despite being expressed under
the SOS-regulated native promoter and from low copy number plasmids. Increased
intracellular concentrations of DinB variants may somehow have a more
deleterious effect on survival than lack of DinB. Thus, the
dinB(D103N) and dinB(F13V) alleles (Table S1)
were crossed onto the chromosome replacing
dinB
+, as indicated in Materials and Methods. Consistent with the hypothesis, we
find that cells with a chromosomal copy of dinB(D103N) are no
longer highly sensitive to MMS (compare ∼100 fold more killing than
ΔdinB in Fig. 2 with the same lethality as ΔdinB in
Fig. 3) or NFZ at any of
the concentrations tested, and survive treatment as
dinB cells (Fig. 3). Conversely, cells
with dinB(F13V) in the chromosome remain more sensitive to NFZ
than ΔdinB, though the extent of sensitivity is less
dramatic in the chromosome (∼10 fold, white bars; Fig. 3). These data demonstrate that the
observed exacerbated sensitivity phenotypes of ΔdinB
strains with plasmid-borne TLS deficient dinB alleles are not
solely due to elevated intracellular concentrations of these proteins. However,
the mechanism(s) underlying this phenomenon is/are not fully understood.
Figure 3
MMS or NFZ survival phenotypes of strains with catalytic or TLS
deficient dinB chromosomal alleles.
Cells carrying a single chromosomal copy of the catalytic deficient
dinB(D103N), the TLS deficient
dinB(F13V), and other
dinB alleles were assayed for survival as indicated
in material and methods with MMS
(7.5 mM) or NFZ (0.008 mM). Error bars represent the standard deviation
of the mean from at least 3 independent experiments.
MMS or NFZ survival phenotypes of strains with catalytic or TLS
deficient dinB chromosomal alleles.
Cells carrying a single chromosomal copy of the catalytic deficient
dinB(D103N), the TLS deficient
dinB(F13V), and other
dinB alleles were assayed for survival as indicated
in material and methods with MMS
(7.5 mM) or NFZ (0.008 mM). Error bars represent the standard deviation
of the mean from at least 3 independent experiments.
The aromatic triad is required for in vivo DinB TLS
In an effort to gain insights into the TLS activity of DinB in alkylation lesion
bypass, we looked for conserved residues in the DinB active site that could be
as important as F13 in DinB N-dG TLS. This
analysis, carried out with a large number of DinB sequences (>100) in both
prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms (including the DinBhuman homologue Pol
κ), surprisingly shows that phenylalanine 13 (F13) is only somewhat
conserved (42%). However, if the analysis also considers tyrosine, a
structurally similar residue, then F13/Y13 becomes 97% conserved. We
hypothesized that the aromatic ring of tyrosine or phenylalanine fulfills an
identical role in lesion bypass. We constructed a DinB derivative with a
tyrosine at position 13 instead of phenylalanine (pdinB(F13Y))
in the same low copy number plasmid mentioned in the above section, and
introduced it by transformation into ΔdinB. As predicted,
the ΔdinB/pdinB(F13Y) strain has the same
level survival after MMS or NFZ treatment as cells with wild-type
DinB+ (Fig.
4).
Figure 4
An aromatic triad in the DinB active site is required for
ΔdinB survival upon treatment with MMS or
NFZ.
ΔdinB harboring the dinB alleles
with mutations at position 12, 13, and 79 were treated with MMS (7.5 mM;
gray bars) or NFZ (0.008 mM; white bars). Treatments were carried out as
described in materials and methods.
Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean from at least 3
independent experiments. Only top error bars are shown for clarity.
An aromatic triad in the DinB active site is required for
ΔdinB survival upon treatment with MMS or
NFZ.
ΔdinB harboring the dinB alleles
with mutations at position 12, 13, and 79 were treated with MMS (7.5 mM;
gray bars) or NFZ (0.008 mM; white bars). Treatments were carried out as
described in materials and methods.
Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean from at least 3
independent experiments. Only top error bars are shown for clarity.We have shown (Figs. S1, 2 and
3) that F13 is important
for the TLS of alkylation lesions, but strains expressing this allele survive
better in MMS than in NFZ regardless of the allele location (Figs. 2 and 3). F13 was also changed to
alanine or serine. Unlike dinB(F13V), both
dinB(F13A) (data not shown) and dinB(F13S)
(Fig. 4) result in
decreased survival of ΔdinB cells upon NFZ or MMS treatment
independent of whether the dinB alleles are expressed from a
plasmid (Fig. 4) or from the
chromosome (Fig. 3). It can
be inferred from these data that the role of the F13 residue in the DinB bypass
of alkylation DNA lesions is likely different from its role in
N-dG bypass, but is nevertheless essential
for the bypass of MMS-derived lesions in vivo.The two other aromatic residues that are also highly conserved (>95%
conservation among DinB sequences) and happen to be in close proximity to F13 in
the DinB tertiary structure are Y79 and F12 (Fig. 1). The conservation is true even at the
structural level (Fig. 1,
compare DinB and Pol κ) suggesting that, unlike F13, both the aromatic ring
and the polarity of these residues might be equally important for lesion
bypass.We changed each one of these residues, and assessed their function by measuring
survival of ΔdinB carrying the various
dinB alleles upon MMS or NFZ treatment. Y79 or F12 were
changed to the aromatic residue with the opposite polarity (phenylalanine or
tyrosine respectively) or to the non-aromatic residues alanine or serine.There is no measureable survival defect for the ΔdinB strain
upon MMS treatment when the conserved Y79 residue is replaced by phenylalanine
(Fig. 4). However,
ΔdinB cells expressing dinB(Y79A) show
an enhanced sensitivity to MMS or NFZ compared to ΔdinB
(pVector; Fig. 4). A similar
enhanced sensitivity, though not to the same degree, was observed in NFZ-treated
cells when the dinB(Y79A) allele is expressed from the
chromosome (Fig. 3). In
contrast, the result of exchanging the tyrosine for a non-aromatic amino acid of
the same polarity, serine, leads to poor survival in MMS or NFZ treatment,
similar to that shown by the ΔdinB strain (Fig. 4).ΔdinB expressing the plasmid-borne
dinB(F12Y) allele, however, show reduced survival in MMS or
NFZ when compared to cells carrying pdinB, but
survive better than ΔdinB, suggesting that TLS is lessened
but not abolished in this variant (Fig. 4). This is confirmed by changing F12 to alanine (Fig. 4), which results in
survival similar to that of cells lacking dinB. We also
investigated the effect of changing F12 to a non-aromatic residue of the
opposite polarity and found that the F12S mutation does abolish TLS activity
in vivo, similar to the F12A mutation (data not shown).Taken together, the data demonstrate that the aromatic triad consisting of F12,
F13, and Y79 are all needed for survival in MMS. The relevance of each residue
in TLS varies depending on the lesion and is independent of the location
(plasmid or chromosome) of the dinB TLS deficient allele.
Importantly, the absolute requirement of these residues for DinB lesion bypass,
and the evolutionary conservation of these aromatic residues, suggest the
importance of corresponding residues in DinB homologues, such as human Pol κ
(Fig. 1).
Survival effects of various dinB alleles expressed in
ΔdinB depend on both the lesion and the DinB
processivity clamp-binding motif
We asked whether the survival phenotypes of ΔdinB expressing
various DinB variants were independent of the DNA damaging agent used to treat
cells. We took advantage of the enhanced sensitivity phenotype observed in
ΔdinB strains such as those carrying plasmid-borne
dinB(D103N), dinB(F13S), and dinB(Y79A) (to MMS or NFZ), or
dinB(F13V) (to NFZ). We have already shown (Fig. 3) that the increased
sensitivity of the ΔdinB/pdinB(D103N)
strain to MMS or NFZ compared to
dinB, is likely due to
elevated intracellular concentrations. Nonetheless, when compared to
ΔdinB, expression of the dinB(F13S),
dinB(Y79A), or dinB(F13V) alleles results
in enhanced sensitivity to DinB cognate lesions regardless of whether they are
expressed from a plasmid or from the chromosome (see Figs. 2, 3, and 4). Therefore, if survival upon MMS or NFZ
treatment is TLS independent, dinB(F13V), and especially
dinB(D103N) should render
dinB strains sensitive
to any DNA damaging agent regardless of the lesion it might bring about. UV
damage was chosen to test this model because DinB is unable to bypass the
thymine-thymine dimer lesions generated in the major grove of the DNA upon
treatment [42].
37 J/m2 of UV light, a dosage at which ΔdinB or
dinB strains are equally killed was
used to treat ΔdinB strains with these
dinB alleles. We find that
dinB cells bearing
either the dinB catalytic or TLS deficient alleles survive as
well as ΔdinB or dinB
strains upon UV treatment. In contrast, at comparable levels of MMS or NFZ
treatment, ΔdinB strains expressing DinB(D103N) or
DinB(F13V), show enhanced sensitivity to MMS or NFZ (Fig. 5). Thus, only DinB cognate lesions
result in poor survival of ΔdinB cells expressing these
dinB alleles, suggesting that survival in MMS or NFZ
treatment is linked to TLS.
Figure 5
dinB deficient alleles affect
ΔdinB survival only upon treatment with
reagents that generate DinB cognate lesions.
ΔdinB strains carrying the plasmid-borne variants
of DinB were compared at levels of UV (37 J/m2) at which
ΔdinB and
dinB
+ are equally killed (black
bars). Significant variations in survival were only observed upon
comparable levels of MMS (7.5 mM; gray bars) or NFZ (0.008 mM; white
bars) treatments. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the
mean from at least 3 independent experiments. Only top error bars are
shown for clarity.
dinB deficient alleles affect
ΔdinB survival only upon treatment with
reagents that generate DinB cognate lesions.
ΔdinB strains carrying the plasmid-borne variants
of DinB were compared at levels of UV (37 J/m2) at which
ΔdinB and
dinB
+ are equally killed (black
bars). Significant variations in survival were only observed upon
comparable levels of MMS (7.5 mM; gray bars) or NFZ (0.008 mM; white
bars) treatments. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the
mean from at least 3 independent experiments. Only top error bars are
shown for clarity.We next investigated whether the DinB variant-mediated enhanced sensitivity in
MMS or NFZ requires the carboxy terminal residues known to interact with the
processivity factor β-clamp [43]. Thus, derivatives of
DinB(F13V), DinB(D103N), and DinB+, as a control, lacking the
DinB β-clamp binding motif (347LVLGL351; [43], [44]) were
constructed in the same low copy number plasmids (Table S1).
If ΔdinB strains expressing DinB variants lacking the
β-clamp binding motif are as sensitive to either MMS or NFZ as
ΔdinB, then it could be inferred that the observed
enhanced sensitivity is mediated through interactions with the β-clamp, and
is consistent with the idea that these DinB variants are localized at the
replication fork. We found that ΔdinB with
pdinBΔβ are more sensitive to
MMS or NFZ compared to pdinB
+ (Fig. 6). In contrast,
ΔdinB cells expressing DinB(D103N)Δβ on MMS or
NFZ (Fig. 6) and those
expressing DinB(F13V)Δβ on NFZ (Fig. 6B) are more resistant to these DNA
damaging agents. These data suggest that the enhanced sensitivity observed with
these dinB alleles is dependent on the β-clamp binding
motif. This is perhaps the result of the interaction of DinB with the
β-clamp, which is likely to be occurring at the replication fork.
Figure 6
ΔdinB with variants lacking the residues
comprising the β-clamp binding motif are no longer highly sensitive
to MMS or NFZ.
(A) A representative LB medium plate containing MMS (7.5 mM)
with 10 fold serial dilutions of ΔdinB cells
bearing the plasmid-borne dinB alleles is shown.
(B) Same as (A) except cells were
deposited on LB medium plates with NFZ (0.008 mM).
ΔdinB with variants lacking the residues
comprising the β-clamp binding motif are no longer highly sensitive
to MMS or NFZ.
(A) A representative LB medium plate containing MMS (7.5 mM)
with 10 fold serial dilutions of ΔdinB cells
bearing the plasmid-borne dinB alleles is shown.
(B) Same as (A) except cells were
deposited on LB medium plates with NFZ (0.008 mM).From these independent sets of data we can deduce that the in
vivo phenotypes observed in cells expressing dinB
catalytic or other dinB alleles are the result of in
vivo deficiencies in specific lesion bypass.
DNA damage-induced mutation frequency as a measure of accurate TLS
activity
In this report we present a DNA damage-induced mutagenesis screen with a
substantial mutational target size [45], [46]. Cells are treated with
either MMS or NFZ at concentrations where ΔdinB cells are
equally killed, i.e. 7.5 mM MMS and 0.008 mM NFZ. Bacterial colonies that
survive the treatment are then screened for loss of growth in minimal medium. A
very conservative estimation of the target size is between 35 and 100 Kb, since
any mutation that results in the inability to grow in minimal medium will be
scored as a mutant. These include genes involved in amino acid, vitamin, or
nucleotide biosynthesis. There is no selection in the detection of the mutant
population that arises as the result of DNA damage and mutant colonies unable to
grow in minimal medium are clonal.We find that there is virtually no DNA damage-induced mutagenesis in
ΔdinB expressing dinB
+
(Fig. 7). Importantly,
although DinB is arguably at higher intracellular concentration than when
expressed from a single chromosomal copy, it does not increase DNA
damage-induced mutant frequency in this assay simply by being at a higher
intracellular concentration. We also found low frequencies of mutants in
ΔdinB and in ΔdinB expressing the
catalytically inactive dinB(D103N) (Fig. 7), both of which are presumed to be the
consequence of an activity independent from DinB.
Figure 7
DNA damage-induced mutants.
(A) ΔdinB with plasmid-borne DinB
variants were treated with MMS (7.5 mM), NFZ (0.008 mM), or UV light (37
J/m2) and screened for mutants unable to grow on glucose
minimal medium. Only ΔdinB strains carrying
plasmid-borne dinB,
dinB(D103N), dinB(F13V),
dinB(F13S), or dinB(Y79A) alleles
were assessed for UV-induced mutants. NFZ-induced mutants were also
ascertained in the dinB(Y79A) strain in which the DinB
variant is expressed from the chromosome (bold font). Mutants were
equally distributed when independent cultures were analyzed. All samples
have a standard error ≤5% of the average of mutants obtained
per individual culture. (B) The fold difference shown in
mutants is relative to ΔdinB.
DNA damage-induced mutants.
(A) ΔdinB with plasmid-borne DinB
variants were treated with MMS (7.5 mM), NFZ (0.008 mM), or UV light (37
J/m2) and screened for mutants unable to grow on glucose
minimal medium. Only ΔdinB strains carrying
plasmid-borne dinB,
dinB(D103N), dinB(F13V),
dinB(F13S), or dinB(Y79A) alleles
were assessed for UV-induced mutants. NFZ-induced mutants were also
ascertained in the dinB(Y79A) strain in which the DinB
variant is expressed from the chromosome (bold font). Mutants were
equally distributed when independent cultures were analyzed. All samples
have a standard error ≤5% of the average of mutants obtained
per individual culture. (B) The fold difference shown in
mutants is relative to ΔdinB.Cells expressing dinB with mutations in the aromatic triad
residues F13, Y79, and F12 display a frequency of MMS-induced mutants similar to
ΔdinB or to the
ΔdinB/pdinB(D103N) strain (Fig. 7). We find that
ΔdinB cells expressing the DinB(F13V) variant have a
modest increase in both MMS and NFZ-induced mutant frequency when compared to
either ΔdinB or to those expressing DinB(D103N) (Fig. 7). Unexpectedly, there
is a substantial increase in mutants for NFZ-treated ΔdinB
strains expressing pdinB(F13S), pdinB(Y79A),
or pdinB(Y79S) (Fig. 7). Notably, this increase is also observed in the
dinB(Y79A) chromosomal strain (Fig. 7; bold font).We also assessed the number of UV-induced mutants to validate the level of
mutagenesis that is DinB-independent. We expected that UV-induced mutant
frequencies would be similar to ΔdinB or
ΔdinB strains expressing the catalytically inactive
derivative DinB(D103N) after NFZ or MMS treatment. This is what was observed
(Fig. 7) in the cases
where it was determined. Intriguingly, we observed an increase in UV-induced
mutants in strains expressing pDinB+ but not pDinB(D103N)
(compare columns NFZ or MMS with UV for pDinB+ in Fig. 7A). This has been
previously reported for DinB+, in an independent experiment in
which selection for UV-induced Arg+ mutants was carried out
[40]. Thus,
there might be a role for DinB, or more likely DinB with its interacting
partners [40],
in regulating this mutagenesis.
MMS induces the SOS-gene network more strongly than NFZ
The difference between NFZ- and MMS-induced mutant frequencies might be due to a
fundamental distinction between the mechanisms regulating DinB alkylation or
N-dG lesion bypass. Perhaps there are other
SOS induced proteins that might explain the elevated mutant frequency observed
exclusively upon NFZ treatment. To measure the relative induction of the
SOS-gene network in cells treated with MMS or NFZ, a green fluorescent protein
(GFP; [47])
reporter plasmid was used. In this assay GFP is expressed under the regulation
of the sulA gene promoter, an SOS-network gene [48], and GFP
fluorescence is thus an indicator of SOS induction. This plasmid was introduced
into both dinB and ΔdinB
strains by transformation. In this experiment ciprofloxacin [49] instead of UV
irradiation was chosen as the SOS inducer to directly evaluate GFP fluorescence
in a comparable time frame.We find that expression of GFP upon treatment with a DNA damaging agent is
dinB independent (Figs. 8 and S2).
Strikingly, we find that GFP fluorescence is greater in cells treated with MMS
than in those treated with NFZ (Figs. 8 and S2). Moreover, no fluorescence was detected
at NFZ concentrations lower than 0.06 mM, the concentration depicted in Fig. 8. Yet the NFZ
concentration used to treat cells throughout this report is 7.5 times lower i.e.
0.008 mM, an NFZ concentration insufficient to induce the SOS response at levels
similar to those measured in MMS treatment. Thus, it can be inferred that the
large number of NFZ-induced mutants is specific to the
N-dG lesions and not due to overexpression of
any other SOS-induced activity.
Figure 8
Relative induction of the SOS gene network in cells treated with MMS
or NFZ.
dinB, ΔdinB, and
ΔrecA strains carrying a plasmid that expresses
GFP from an SOS inducible promoter (sulAp-GFP) were
treated with MMS (7.5 mM), NFZ (0.06 mM shown), or the strong SOS
inducer ciprofloxacin (Cip) (0.1 µg/mL) [49].
dinB and
ΔdinB strains display a significant 50%
increase, compared to the control ΔrecA strain, in
the ratio of Fluorescence/OD600 after 2 hours of NFZ
treatment and after 1.5 hours of both MMS and ciprofloxacin treatments,
5 hours is shown. For 20 hour kinetic see Fig
S2. No increased fluorescence is detected in NFZ
concentrations below 0.06 mM (data not shown) when compared to untreated
dinB and
ΔdinB cells, or the ΔrecA
negative control during the time frame the experiment was carried out
(see Fig
S2 for 20 hour kinetic). Error bars represent the standard
deviation of the mean from at least 4 replicates.
Relative induction of the SOS gene network in cells treated with MMS
or NFZ.
dinB, ΔdinB, and
ΔrecA strains carrying a plasmid that expresses
GFP from an SOS inducible promoter (sulAp-GFP) were
treated with MMS (7.5 mM), NFZ (0.06 mM shown), or the strong SOS
inducer ciprofloxacin (Cip) (0.1 µg/mL) [49].
dinB and
ΔdinB strains display a significant 50%
increase, compared to the control ΔrecA strain, in
the ratio of Fluorescence/OD600 after 2 hours of NFZ
treatment and after 1.5 hours of both MMS and ciprofloxacin treatments,
5 hours is shown. For 20 hour kinetic see Fig
S2. No increased fluorescence is detected in NFZ
concentrations below 0.06 mM (data not shown) when compared to untreated
dinB and
ΔdinB cells, or the ΔrecA
negative control during the time frame the experiment was carried out
(see Fig
S2 for 20 hour kinetic). Error bars represent the standard
deviation of the mean from at least 4 replicates.Taken together, this evidence indicates that the aromatic triad residues play
different and nuanced roles in the TLS of MMS- and NFZ-induced lesions. The
analyses carried out suggest that the active site is pliable and that the
aromatic triad is essential for both bypass and accuracy.
Discussion
Much has been learned about the Y family translesion (TLS) DNA polymerase DNA Pol IV
(DinB) in E. coli
[1], [6], [50]. This DNA
polymerase inserts a nucleotide opposite specific DNA lesions (i.e. bypass or
translesion synthesis activity) with relatively high accuracy compared to other Y
DNA polymerases [15], [16]. Though under some conditions DinB has been shown to
cause −1 frameshift mutations on misaligned templates [40], [51], [52], this appears to be
regulated by protein-protein interactions [40], [51]. However, knowledge is lacking in
regard to the role played by DinB's active site residues, in alkylation lesion
bypass. Moreover, it is not known whether residues in the active site play a role in
the accuracy of bypass of distinct DNA lesions. To fill this knowledge gap, we have
undertaken structure/function analyses of the DinB active site and have gained
insights into the active site residues that govern bypass and fidelity of different
lesions. In the experiments reported here we use MMS and NFZ, reagents known to
cause DNA lesions that kill cells without DinB [16], [19]. Specifically, we studied an
aromatic residue triad F12, F13, and Y79 in the DinB active site (Fig. 1) by changing these
conserved residues to ones of different size and polarity. Notably, this is the
first report in which a number of these DinB variants have been studied when
expressed from the chromosome.The F13 residue is critical for both in vivo and in
vitro DinB mediated bypass of N-dG lesions
[16]. Agreeing
with previously published reports [16], expression of the DinB(F13V) variant in
ΔdinB cells from a low copy number plasmid causes enhanced
NFZ sensitivity (Fig. 2). This
phenotypic signature is remarkably maintained when this dinB allele
is expressed from the chromosome (Fig.
3). Notably, there is no enhanced sensitivity to MMS (Figs. 2 and 3), suggesting that the DinB active site adjusts
to lesions. Thus, the relevance of different catalytic residues for bypass activity
is likely to be lesion dependent.We investigated whether changing the aromatic triad residues to different aromatic
residues compromised the bypass activity of E. coliDinB. Our
results show that the polarity of the aromatic residue is important for the F12
residue but not for the others (Fig.
4). It can be inferred that either a phenylalanine or a tyrosine at the
F13 or Y79 positions allows for the insertion of a nucleotide opposite an
N-dG or an alkylation lesion, resulting in no
change in the activity of the DNA polymerase. A comparable result has been found in
B-family DNA polymerases [53], [54] when a similarly positioned residue was changed from a
tyrosine to a phenylalanine. Based on the analysis carried out in Dpo4 [55], it is
probable that the DinB(F12Y) mutation reduces hydrophobic packing, which in turn
leads to reduced TLS; however, in the Y79F mutation, the phenylalanine is able to
stabilize the F13 residue allowing for efficient TLS. A recent study demonstrated
that the active site residue Y112 (F13 in DinB) of the humanDinB counterpart, Pol
κ, is required not only for effective bypass of certain lesions and exclusion of
rNTPs from DNA synthesis, but also for mismatch-primer extension [56]. It is plausible
that mutations in either F111 (F12) or Y174 (Y79) could abolish the ability of Pol
κ to carry out any of these functions.We further analyzed these three key aromatic residues by assaying survival of
ΔdinB strains bearing plasmid-borne DinB variants in which
each of the aromatic triad residues were mutated to amino acids without aromatic
rings. None of these variants rescued ΔdinB strains upon MMS or
NFZ treatment, a phenotype that was maintained independently of the allele location
(Figs. 3 and 4), suggesting that all three
aromatic residues are essential for bypass of both alkylation lesions and
N-dG minor groove adducts.It was plausible that poor survival in NFZ or MMS by ΔdinB cells
expressing the various dinB deficient alleles might be due to
increased intracellular DinB concentrations [57] and not necessarily to TLS. If
the variants were causing lethality due to, for example, unregulated access to
stalled replication forks; it should be observed independent of both the treatment
and the dinB deficient allele tested. However, this is not the case
(Fig. 5). Provocatively, the
poor survival phenotype is only observed when cells are treated with either NFZ or
MMS, but not with UV (Fig. 5).
We (Fig. 2), and others [16], [19] have shown that
DinB is necessary for survival in alkylation or N-dG
DNA damage, demonstrating that MMS- and NFZ-induced lesions are cognate DinB
lesions, i.e. DinB activity is critical for survival. The same is true for other
DinB-like polymerases [20], [21]. Differences in survival are only observed when specific
cognate lesions are present on the DNA, suggesting that lesions might actively
recruit DinB polymerases to the replication fork, possibly increasing the local
polymerase concentration. The localized concentration of DinB would then permit
efficient exchange with the replicative polymerase, probably via the β-clamp
[58]. This
suggests that lesion specificity might play an important role in the TLS activity of
DinB. This concept of lesion-induced recruitment of Y family DNA polymerases is
similar to that occurring during somatic hypermutation ([59] and references therein).Importantly, the SOS gene network is robustly induced with MMS but not so with NFZ.
Indeed, at least a 7.5 fold higher NFZ concentration than the one used here to
routinely treat cells with was required to detect any SOS induction (Fig. 8). Interestingly,
nitrofurantoin, another reagent within the class of activated nitrofurans [60] is also a poor
inducer of the SOS response [61], [62], [63]. Thus, intracellular concentrations of DinB and other
SOS-induced proteins would be higher in MMS than in NFZ treated cells. These results
suggest that it is DinB and not other SOS induced proteins that are responsible for
the observed loss in survival of ΔdinB cells expressing
dinB catalytic or TLS deficient alleles (Figs. 2, 3, and 4). Moreover, the phenotypic signature of some of
these deficient alleles is maintained when crossed onto the chromosome (Fig. 3) suggesting that it is not
exclusively due to high intracellular concentrations. Finally, the DinB protein
appears to be properly localized at or near the replication fork since cells
carrying the dinB(F13V)Δβ or
dinB(D103N)Δβ alleles, which lack the conserved motif that
permits DinB-β clamp interactions, are no longer highly sensitive to MMS or NFZ
(Fig. 6). From these data we
can infer that DinB and its variants have to be at or near the replication fork to
effect either survival or lethality of cells upon treatment with reagents producing
DinB cognate lesions.The analysis we have carried out indicates the aromatic triad in the active site of
DinB is needed for cells to survive NFZ or MMS treatment because mutations in the
aromatic triad impair in vivo TLS.Additionally, we report here that the aromatic triad is important for the accuracy of
DinB bypass. The MMS- or UV-induced mutant frequency is quite low for
ΔdinB strains carrying any of the plasmid-borne DinB
variants. Conversely, an NFZ-induced mutator phenotype is apparent in
ΔdinB cells carrying the DinB(Y79A), DinB(Y79S), or
DinB(F13S) derivatives. A similar result is obtained with strains in which
DinB(Y79A) is expressed from the chromosome (Fig. 7). There are two possibilities as to why
only NFZ induced mutagenesis is observed: (1) low fidelity on undamaged DNA, as some
of these variants are known to be incapable of TLS in vitro
[15], [16], and/or (2)
mutagenesis is the product of the in vivo TLS activity of these
DinB variants. It is possible the in vitro and in
vivo properties observed in DinB(Y79) variants are due to the inability
of the new residue at position 79 to properly support F13 in carrying out high
fidelity bypass. Although the substitution of valine for phenylalanine at position
13 does render DinB TLS deficient, it is only when a smaller serine is substituted
for phenylalanine that the fidelity of the polymerase is severely compromised. All
of these changes in either the F13 or Y79 do not affect the bypass fidelity in MMS,
presumably because the active site is flexible and adapts to the different lesions.
Perhaps the fidelity of alkylation lesion bypass is regulated differently from the
fidelity of NFZ-induced lesion bypass.The observed NFZ-induced mutants are also likely DinB dependent. If the mutants were
occurring as a result of the action of another polymerase, i.e. DNA Pol V, it would
have been evident in the UV-induced mutagenesis assay. UV treated cells expressing
DinB variants, display a number of DNA damage-induced mutants that are, for the most
part, equivalent to the level of mutants found both in ΔdinB
carrying the DinB(D103N) variant, which is unable to synthesize DNA, and to cells
without DinB (Fig. 7).
Furthermore, there is evidence that DNA Pol II is not involved in the bypass of MMS-
or NFZ-derived lesions in cells that are proficient for base or nucleotide excision
repair [19], [64], making it
difficult to envision a simple model in which DNA Pol II is responsible for the
observed DNA damage-induced mutagenesis. We carried out Illumina deep sequencing of
the genome of several independent MMS treated
ΔdinB/pdinB(D103N) or
pdinB(F13V) strains that we identified as mutants based on
their inability to grow in minimal medium. Strikingly, MMS-induced mutants of
ΔdinB/pdinB(D103N) have only single base
pair substitutions (SNPs), including those in genes which could be responsible for
the lack of growth in minimal medium (data not shown). Notably, both SNPs and
−1 frameshifts (the mutational signature of DinB(F13V) [40]) were detected in mutants
derived from ΔdinB/pdinB(F13V) strains. This
evidence further suggests that DNA Pol IV and its variants are responsible for
effecting mutagenesis.There is growing evidence for a role of DinB-like polymerases in humancancers [65], [66], [67], [68]. Thus, this triad
of aromatic residues in the DinB active site might be playing similar roles in DinB
homologues especially regarding fidelity. When compared to the in
silico model of DinB, the Pol κ crystal structure shows that the
aromatic triad is identical in conformation (DinBF12, F13 and Y79 are homologous to
Pol κ F111, Y112, and Y174; Fig.
1). Notably, in the 1000 Genomes database [69] we find that there is only one
known polymorphism in the protein sequence of Pol κ that is homologous to
E. coliDinB, (S423R), which is not an active site residue. The
lack of variations in the Pol κ sequences, especially in the active site, agrees
with data showing natural populations of E. coli select against
polymorphisms in the DinB catalytic domain [70]. The mutator phenotypes
observed in cells expressing DinB(F13S, Y79S, or Y79A) also indicate that variations
in homologous residues of Pol κ could lead to a similar reduction in TLS
fidelity. The lack of polymorphisms in humans might also be due to selection against
such changes, perhaps the result of embryonic lethality.Thus, the analyses of the DinB active site and its aromatic triad have provided
insights into mechanisms that govern both TLS and the fidelity of the bypass of
different cognate lesions. In this regard, we found a strikingly low level of DNA
damage-induced mutants in ΔdinB cells expressing wild type DinB
from a low copy number plasmid, despite it both being at a higher copy number than
chromosomal, and having a sizable mutational target. Furthermore, we found few
alkylation DNA damage-induced mutants, in agreement with previous findings [19]. Finally, we
found that the aromatic triad plays a key role in the bypass fidelity of NFZ-induced
lesions. This supports the notion that N-dG lesions
might indeed be the preferred lesions recognized and bypassed by this DNA
polymerase. Although bacteria may encounter NFZ as an antibiotic in the treatment of
infections [71],
we are still left with the question: what is the endogenous source of
N-dG lesions? We have no direct answer yet to
this question, however, since DinB-like DNA polymerases are evolutionarily
conserved, the source of their preferred N-dG lesion
substrate must be the result of an ordinary metabolite. One exciting candidate is
methylglyoxal, a byproduct of glycolysis that can form N
2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine
(N-CEdG) lesions that are bypassed by DinB and
human Pol κ [72].We have shown here that the high fidelity of DinB is apparent upon alkylation damage,
an inescapable and pervasive form of DNA damage, even when the DinB active site
performs in vivo error-prone NFZ-induced lesion bypass. In
addition, we propose that it is the nature of the lesion that localizes DinB to the
replication fork and facilitates protein-protein interactions to prompt DNA
polymerase exchange with the replicative DNA polymerase when it has stalled.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Plasmids
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this report are listed in Table S1.
The P90C ΔdinB strain was generated by P1 transduction
using an allele from the KEIO collection [73] (a kind gift of the Lewis lab
at NEU). Plasmid-borne DinB mutants were constructed using the GeneTailor
Site-Directed Mutagenesis System (Invitrogen) and introduced into
CaCl2 chemically competent cells by transformation [74]. Mutagenic
oligonucleotides are listed in Table S1. Mutations were verified by DNA
sequencing, carried out at the Tufts University Core Facility in Boston, MA.
Survival Assays
Cultures were grown to saturation in either liquid LB or M9 minimal medium [74] with
ampicillin (Amp, 200 µg/mL; Sigma). Serial dilutions of saturated cultures
were treated with varying concentrations of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS, 5,
7.5, and 10 mM; Acros Organics), nitrofurazone (NFZ, 0.008 mM; Sigma), or were
irradiated in minimal medium at a UV (254 nm) intensity of 37
J/m2.
Construction of DinB Variants in the Chromosome
dinB(D103N), dinB(F13V),
dinB(F13S), and dinB(Y79A) alleles were
introduced into the chromosome using the SOE-LRed method [75].
Mutation Assays
Cells were evenly spread with glass beads onto LB medium with 7.5 mM MMS or 0.008
mM NFZ. These concentrations of MMS and NFZ equally killed
ΔdinB cells. UV irradiation (∼37 J/m2)
was carried out on M9 minimal medium supplemented with casaminoacids [45]. Under these
conditions, this level of irradiation killed ΔdinB and
dinB
+ cells to the same extent. Surviving
colonies were screened for loss of function on minimal medium without amino acid
supplementation [45], except for proline [76], which is required by the
parental strain. Three independent experiments were carried out per DinB
derivative until a minimum of 1000 colonies were screened.
SOS Induction Assays
Cells bearing a plasmid expressing GFP from a sulA promoter
(pUA66-sulA, [47]) were grown to saturation
in minimal medium with Kanamycin (35 µg/mL; Sigma). These cultures were
diluted 1 to 10 in the same growth medium with the appropriate concentration of
MMS (7.5 mM), NFZ (0.008–0.06 mM), or ciprofloxacin (0.1 µg/mL, Cip;
Sigma) in 96 well black plates with clear flat bottom (Corning). The plates were
incubated at 37°C with intermittent shaking for 20 hours. GFP fluorescence
(485/528 nm; Excitation/Emission) and turbidity (600 nm) were measured every 5
minutes with in a BioTek Synergy HT-I plate reader.Kinetic of MMS lethality of
Δ
strains harboring
either
alleles. Only the
plasmid-borne dinB
+ allele rescues
ΔdinBMMS sensitivity. Neither plasmid-borne
DinB(D103N) nor DinB(F13V) rescue ΔdinB cells treated
with various concentrations of MMS. Enhanced sensitivity is observed in
ΔdinB strains expressing DinB(D103N) when compared
to ΔdinB. Error bars represent the standard deviation
of the mean from at least 3 independent experiments.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.MMS is a more robust inducer of the SOS response than NFZ.
Kinetic of the ratio of fluorescence over OD600 is shown for
dinB, ΔdinB,
and ΔrecA strains carrying psulAp-GFP.
Strains were treated with MMS (7.5 mM), NFZ (0.06 mM shown), or Cip (0.1
µg/mL). Fluorescence readings and optical density (600 nM) were taken
every 5 minutes for 20 hours in a plate reader. Data shown are the average
of at least 4 replicates, and the standard deviation of the mean is
≤25% for all samples.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Strain, Plasmid, and Oligonucleotide Table.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Ivana Bjedov; Chitralekha Nag Dasgupta; Dea Slade; Sophie Le Blastier; Marjorie Selva; Ivan Matic Journal: Genetics Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: I M Murray-Lyon; A L Eddleston; R Williams; M Brown; B M Hogbin; A Bennett; J C Edwards; K W Taylor Journal: Lancet Date: 1968-10-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Tommy F Tashjian; Claudia Danilowicz; Anne-Elizabeth Molza; Brian H Nguyen; Chantal Prévost; Mara Prentiss; Veronica G Godoy Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Tiziana M Cafarelli; Thomas J Rands; Ryan W Benson; Pamela A Rudnicki; Ida Lin; Veronica G Godoy Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Nidhi Shrivastav; Bogdan I Fedeles; Deyu Li; James C Delaney; Lauren E Frick; James J Foti; Graham C Walker; John M Essigmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240