Literature DB >> 17173371

Methylating agents and DNA repair responses: Methylated bases and sources of strand breaks.

Michael D Wyatt1, Douglas L Pittman.   

Abstract

The chemical methylating agents methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) have been used for decades as classical DNA damaging agents. These agents have been utilized to uncover and explore pathways of DNA repair, DNA damage response, and mutagenesis. MMS and MNNG modify DNA by adding methyl groups to a number of nucleophilic sites on the DNA bases, although MNNG produces a greater percentage of O-methyl adducts. There has been substantial progress elucidating direct reversal proteins that remove methyl groups and base excision repair (BER), which removes and replaces methylated bases. Direct reversal proteins and BER, thus, counteract the toxic, mutagenic, and clastogenic effects of methylating agents. Despite recent progress, the complexity of DNA damage responses to methylating agents is still being discovered. In particular, there is growing understanding of pathways such as homologous recombination, lesion bypass, and mismatch repair that react when the response of direct reversal proteins and BER is insufficient. Furthermore, the importance of proper balance within the steps in BER has been uncovered with the knowledge that DNA structural intermediates during BER are deleterious. A number of issues complicate the elucidation of the downstream responses when direct reversal is insufficient or BER is imbalanced. These include inter-species differences, cell-type-specific differences within mammals and between cancer cell lines, and the type of methyl damage or BER intermediate encountered. MMS also carries a misleading reputation of being a radiomimetic, that is, capable of directly producing strand breaks. This review focuses on the DNA methyl damage caused by MMS and MNNG for each site of potential methylation to summarize what is known about the repair of such damage and the downstream responses and consequences if the damage is not repaired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17173371      PMCID: PMC2542901          DOI: 10.1021/tx060164e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  170 in total

1.  A Chinese hamster ovary cell line hypersensitive to ionizing radiation and deficient in repair replication.

Authors:  L F Fuller; R B Painter
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Mechanisms of DNA sequence selective alkylation of guanine-N7 positions by nitrogen mustards.

Authors:  K W Kohn; J A Hartley; W B Mattes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-12-23       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Cells from an immunodeficient patient (46BR) with a defect in DNA ligation are hypomutable but hypersensitive to the induction of sister chromatid exchanges.

Authors:  L M Henderson; C F Arlett; S A Harcourt; A R Lehmann; B C Broughton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  In vivo mutagenesis by O6-methylguanine built into a unique site in a viral genome.

Authors:  E L Loechler; C L Green; J M Essigmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Methylation-induced blocks to in vitro DNA replication.

Authors:  K Larson; J Sahm; R Shenkar; B Strauss
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  The molecular origin of DNA-drug specificity in netropsin and distamycin.

Authors:  M L Kopka; C Yoon; D Goodsell; P Pjura; R E Dickerson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Isolation and cross-sensitivity of X-ray-sensitive mutants of V79-4 hamster cells.

Authors:  N J Jones; R Cox; J Thacker
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  A CHO-cell strain having hypersensitivity to mutagens, a defect in DNA strand-break repair, and an extraordinary baseline frequency of sister-chromatid exchange.

Authors:  L H Thompson; K W Brookman; L E Dillehay; A V Carrano; J A Mazrimas; C L Mooney; J L Minkler
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Imidazole open ring 7-methylguanine: an inhibitor of DNA synthesis.

Authors:  S Boiteux; J Laval
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1983-01-27       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Inducible repair of O-alkylated DNA pyrimidines in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T V McCarthy; P Karran; T Lindahl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  158 in total

1.  Minimally cytotoxic doses of temozolomide produce radiosensitization in human glioblastoma cells regardless of MGMT expression.

Authors:  Michael S Bobola; Douglas D Kolstoe; A Blank; John R Silber
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Replication stress checkpoint signaling controls tRNA gene transcription.

Authors:  Vesna C Nguyen; Brett W Clelland; Darren J Hockman; Sonya L Kujat-Choy; Holly E Mewhort; Michael C Schultz
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  Mitochondrial DNA ligase is dispensable for the viability of cultured cells but essential for mtDNA maintenance.

Authors:  Inna N Shokolenko; Rafik Z Fayzulin; Sachin Katyal; Peter J McKinnon; Glenn L Wilson; Mikhail F Alexeyev
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Replication of the 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-N(5)-(methyl)-formamidopyrimidine (MeFapy-dGuo) adduct by eukaryotic DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Plamen P Christov; Kinrin Yamanaka; Jeong-Yun Choi; Kei-ichi Takata; Richard D Wood; F Peter Guengerich; R Stephen Lloyd; Carmelo J Rizzo
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  DNA glycosylase activity and cell proliferation are key factors in modulating homologous recombination in vivo.

Authors:  Orsolya Kiraly; Guanyu Gong; Megan D Roytman; Yoshiyuki Yamada; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Control of Trx1 redox state modulates protection against methyl methanesulfonate-induced DNA damage via stabilization of p21.

Authors:  Li Gu; Wei Gao; Hui Min Yang; Bei Bei Wang; Xiao Na Wang; Jianguo Xu; Hong Zhang
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Effect of N7-methylation on base pairing patterns of guanine: a DFT study.

Authors:  Swarnadeep Biswas; Pradeep Kumar Shukla
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Bifunctional cross-linking approaches for mass spectrometry-based investigation of nucleic acids and protein-nucleic acid assemblies.

Authors:  M Scalabrin; S M Dixit; M M Makshood; C E Krzemien; Daniele Fabris
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Human CST abundance determines recovery from diverse forms of DNA damage and replication stress.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Jason Stewart; Carolyn M Price
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Cells deficient in PARP-1 show an accelerated accumulation of DNA single strand breaks, but not AP sites, over the PARP-1-proficient cells exposed to MMS.

Authors:  Brian F Pachkowski; Keizo Tano; Valeriy Afonin; Rhoderick H Elder; Shunichi Takeda; Masami Watanabe; James A Swenberg; Jun Nakamura
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.