Literature DB >> 12509274

Pivotal role of the beta-clamp in translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in E. coli cells.

Olivier J Becherel1, Robert P P Fuchs, Jérôme Wagner.   

Abstract

The genetic information is continuously subjected to the attack by endogenous and exogenous chemical and physical carcinogens that damage the DNA template, thus compromising its biochemical functions. Despite the multiple and efficient DNA repair systems that have evolved to cope with the large variety of damages, some lesions may persist and, as a consequence, interfere with DNA replication. By essence, the damaged-DNA replication process (hereafter termed translesion synthesis or TLS) is a major source of point mutations and is therefore deeply involved in the onset of human diseases such as cancer. Recent identification of numerous DNA polymerases involved in TLS has shed new light onto the molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis. Here, we show that in vivo, both error-free and mutagenic bypass activities of the three DNA polymerases known to be involved in TLS in Escherichia coli (PolII, PolIV and PolV) strictly depend upon the integrity of small peptidic sequences identified as their beta-clamp binding motif. Thus, in addition to its crucial role as the processivity factor of the PolIII replicase, the beta-clamp plays a pivotal role during the TLS process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12509274     DOI: 10.1016/s1568-7864(02)00106-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  52 in total

Review 1.  DNA replication fidelity in Escherichia coli: a multi-DNA polymerase affair.

Authors:  Iwona J Fijalkowska; Roel M Schaaper; Piotr Jonczyk
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  Competitive processivity-clamp usage by DNA polymerases during DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  Francisco J López de Saro; Roxana E Georgescu; Myron F Goodman; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The dynamic processivity of the T4 DNA polymerase during replication.

Authors:  Jingsong Yang; Zhihao Zhuang; Rosa Maria Roccasecca; Michael A Trakselis; Stephen J Benkovic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Defining the position of the switches between replicative and bypass DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Shingo Fujii; Robert P Fuchs
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV), but not Pol II, dynamically switches with a stalled Pol III* replicase.

Authors:  Justin M H Heltzel; Robert W Maul; David W Wolff; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Role of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I in conferring viability upon the dnaN159 mutant strain.

Authors:  Robert W Maul; Laurie H Sanders; James B Lim; Rosemary Benitez; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  UmuD and RecA directly modulate the mutagenic potential of the Y family DNA polymerase DinB.

Authors:  Veronica G Godoy; Daniel F Jarosz; Sharotka M Simon; Alexej Abyzov; Valentin Ilyin; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Shifting replication between IInd, IIIrd, and IVth gears.

Authors:  Justin Courcelle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  SSB as an organizer/mobilizer of genome maintenance complexes.

Authors:  Robert D Shereda; Alexander G Kozlov; Timothy M Lohman; Michael M Cox; James L Keck
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.250

10.  The active form of DNA polymerase V is UmuD'(2)C-RecA-ATP.

Authors:  Qingfei Jiang; Kiyonobu Karata; Roger Woodgate; Michael M Cox; Myron F Goodman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.