Literature DB >> 10628968

Some features of the mutability of bacteria during nonlethal selection.

V G Godoy1, F S Gizatullin, M S Fox.   

Abstract

We describe the mutability of the Trp(-) chromosomal +1 frameshift mutation trpE7999 during nonlethal selection, finding that the appearance of Trp(+) revertants behaves similarly to that of episomal Lac(+) revertants. In addition, we show that a feature of the Lac(+) and Trp(+) mutability is the accumulation of Trp(+) and Lac(+) revertants with additional unselected mutations, most of which are not due to heritable mutators. The cells undergoing nonlethal selection apparently experience an epigenetic change resulting in a subset of bacteria with elevated mutability that often remain hypermutable for the duration of selection. The epigenetic change provoked by nonlethal selection appears to be mediated by a unique function provided by the F'128 episome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10628968      PMCID: PMC1460914     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

1.  Conditional mutator phenotypes in hMSH2-deficient tumor cell lines.

Authors:  B Richards; H Zhang; G Phear; M Meuth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Nonadaptive mutations occur on the F' episome during adaptive mutation conditions in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Molecular handles on adaptive mutation.

Authors:  S M Rosenberg; R S Harris; J Torkelson
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 4.  Adaptive mutation: has the unicorn landed?

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genome-wide hypermutation in a subpopulation of stationary-phase cells underlies recombination-dependent adaptive mutation.

Authors:  J Torkelson; R S Harris; M J Lombardo; J Nagendran; C Thulin; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-06-02       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Mismatch repair protein MutL becomes limiting during stationary-phase mutation.

Authors:  R S Harris; G Feng; K J Ross; R Sidhu; C Thulin; S Longerich; S K Szigety; M E Winkler; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Transient expression of a mutator phenotype in cancer cells.

Authors:  L A Loeb
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A direct role for DNA polymerase III in adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R S Harris; H J Bull; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1997-04-14       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Two enzymes, both of which process recombination intermediates, have opposite effects on adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P L Foster; J M Trimarchi; R A Maurer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Multiple pathways for SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: an overexpression of dinB/dinP results in strongly enhancing mutagenesis in the absence of any exogenous treatment to damage DNA.

Authors:  S R Kim; G Maenhaut-Michel; M Yamada; Y Yamamoto; K Matsui; T Sofuni; T Nohmi; H Ohmori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  28 in total

1.  Evidence that stationary-phase hypermutation in the Escherichia coli chromosome is promoted by recombination.

Authors:  H J Bull; G J McKenzie; P J Hastings; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The SOS response regulates adaptive mutation.

Authors:  G J McKenzie; R S Harris; P L Lee; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Adaptive mutation: implications for evolution.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Stationary-phase mutation in the bacterial chromosome: recombination protein and DNA polymerase IV dependence.

Authors:  H J Bull; M J Lombardo; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evidence that selected amplification of a bacterial lac frameshift allele stimulates Lac(+) reversion (adaptive mutation) with or without general hypermutability.

Authors:  E Susan Slechta; Jing Liu; Dan I Andersson; John R Roth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2000

7.  Error-prone polymerase, DNA polymerase IV, is responsible for transient hypermutation during adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Joshua D Tompkins; Jennifer L Nelson; Jill C Hazel; Stacy L Leugers; Jeffrey D Stumpf; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Adaptive mutation: general mutagenesis is not a programmed response to stress but results from rare coamplification of dinB with lac.

Authors:  E Susan Slechta; Kim L Bunny; Elisabeth Kugelberg; Eric Kofoid; Dan I Andersson; John R Roth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Adaptive point mutation and adaptive amplification pathways in the Escherichia coli Lac system: stress responses producing genetic change.

Authors:  Susan M Rosenberg; P J Hastings
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Patricia L Foster
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.