Literature DB >> 23292773

A single residue unique to DinB-like proteins limits formation of the polymerase IV multiprotein complex in Escherichia coli.

Tiziana M Cafarelli1, Thomas J Rands, Ryan W Benson, Pamela A Rudnicki, Ida Lin, Veronica G Godoy.   

Abstract

The activity of DinB is governed by the formation of a multiprotein complex (MPC) with RecA and UmuD. We identified two highly conserved surface residues in DinB, cysteine 66 (C66) and proline 67 (P67). Mapping on the DinB tertiary structure suggests these are noncatalytic, and multiple-sequence alignments indicate that they are unique among DinB-like proteins. To investigate the role of the C66-containing surface in MPC formation, we constructed the dinB(C66A) derivative. We found that DinB(C66A) copurifies with its interacting partners, RecA and UmuD, to a greater extent than DinB. Notably, copurification of RecA with DinB is somewhat enhanced in the absence of UmuD and is further increased for DinB(C66A). In vitro pulldown assays also indicate that DinB(C66A) binds RecA and UmuD better than DinB. We note that the increased affinity of DinB(C66A) for UmuD is RecA dependent. Thus, the C66-containing binding surface appears to be critical to modulate interaction with UmuD, and particularly with RecA. Expression of dinB(C66A) from the chromosome resulted in detectable differences in dinB-dependent lesion bypass fidelity and homologous recombination. Study of this DinB derivative has revealed a key surface on DinB, which appears to modulate the strength of MPC binding, and has suggested a binding order of RecA and UmuD to DinB. These findings will ultimately permit the manipulation of these enzymes to deter bacterial antibiotic resistance acquisition and to gain insights into cancer development in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292773      PMCID: PMC3592004          DOI: 10.1128/JB.01349-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  51 in total

1.  The Y-family of DNA polymerases.

Authors:  H Ohmori; E C Friedberg; R P Fuchs; M F Goodman; F Hanaoka; D Hinkle; T A Kunkel; C W Lawrence; Z Livneh; T Nohmi; L Prakash; S Prakash; T Todo; G C Walker; Z Wang; R Woodgate
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  Error-prone repair DNA polymerases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Myron F Goodman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2001-11-09       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 3.  Damage repair DNA polymerases Y.

Authors:  Wei Yang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 4.  The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  M D Sutton; B T Smith; V G Godoy; G C Walker
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 5.  Computation and analysis of protein circular dichroism spectra.

Authors:  Narasimha Sreerama; Robert W Woody
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  The mutagenesis protein UmuC is a DNA polymerase activated by UmuD', RecA, and SSB and is specialized for translesion replication.

Authors:  N B Reuven; G Arad; A Maor-Shoshani; Z Livneh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A model for SOS-lesion-targeted mutations in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P Pham; J G Bertram; M O'Donnell; R Woodgate; M F Goodman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Roles of chromosomal and episomal dinB genes encoding DNA pol IV in targeted and untargeted mutagenesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S R Kim; K Matsui; M Yamada; P Gruz; T Nohmi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Characterization of Escherichia coli UmuC active-site loops identifies variants that confer UV hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Lisa A Hawver; Caitlin A Gillooly; Penny J Beuning
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Analysis of specialized DNA polymerases expression in human gliomas: association with prognostic significance.

Authors:  Huibo Wang; Wenting Wu; Hong-Wei Wang; Shuai Wang; Yuanyuan Chen; Xiaotian Zhang; Jingmin Yang; Shiguang Zhao; Han-Fei Ding; Daru Lu
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 12.300

View more
  12 in total

1.  A ΔdinB mutation that sensitizes Escherichia coli to the lethal effects of UV- and X-radiation.

Authors:  Mei-Chong W Lee; Magdalena Franco; Doris M Vargas; Deborah A Hudman; Steven J White; Robert G Fowler; Neil J Sargentini
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Residues in the fingers domain of the translesion DNA polymerase DinB enable its unique participation in error-prone double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Tommy F Tashjian; Claudia Danilowicz; Anne-Elizabeth Molza; Brian H Nguyen; Chantal Prévost; Mara Prentiss; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Selection of dinB alleles suppressing survival loss upon dinB overexpression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ryan W Benson; Tiziana M Cafarelli; Thomas J Rands; Ida Lin; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A gatekeeping function of the replicative polymerase controls pathway choice in the resolution of lesion-stalled replisomes.

Authors:  Seungwoo Chang; Karel Naiman; Elizabeth S Thrall; James E Kath; Slobodan Jergic; Nicholas E Dixon; Robert P Fuchs; Joseph J Loparo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Replication stalling activates SSB for recruitment of DNA damage tolerance factors.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Thrall; Sadie C Piatt; Seungwoo Chang; Joseph J Loparo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Recombinase and translesion DNA polymerase decrease the speed of replication fork progression during the DNA damage response in Escherichia coli cells.

Authors:  Kang Wei Tan; Tuan Minh Pham; Asako Furukohri; Hisaji Maki; Masahiro Tatsumi Akiyama
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A Genetic Selection for dinB Mutants Reveals an Interaction between DNA Polymerase IV and the Replicative Polymerase That Is Required for Translesion Synthesis.

Authors:  Michelle K Scotland; Justin M H Heltzel; James E Kath; Jung-Suk Choi; Anthony J Berdis; Joseph J Loparo; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  DNA polymerase IV mediates efficient and quick recovery of replication forks stalled at N2-dG adducts.

Authors:  Mio Ikeda; Asako Furukohri; Gaelle Philippin; Edward Loechler; Masahiro Tatsumi Akiyama; Tsutomu Katayama; Robert P Fuchs; Hisaji Maki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Single-molecule imaging reveals multiple pathways for the recruitment of translesion polymerases after DNA damage.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Thrall; James E Kath; Seungwoo Chang; Joseph J Loparo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  RNA Primer Extension Hinders DNA Synthesis by Escherichia coli Mutagenic DNA Polymerase IV.

Authors:  Tommy F Tashjian; Ida Lin; Verena Belt; Tiziana M Cafarelli; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.