Literature DB >> 24914188

Selection of dinB alleles suppressing survival loss upon dinB overexpression in Escherichia coli.

Ryan W Benson1, Tiziana M Cafarelli1, Thomas J Rands1, Ida Lin1, Veronica G Godoy2.   

Abstract

Escherichia coli strains overproducing DinB undergo survival loss; however, the mechanisms regulating this phenotype are poorly understood. Here we report a genetic selection revealing DinB residues essential to effect this loss-of-survival phenotype. The selection uses strains carrying both an antimutator allele of DNA polymerase III (Pol III) α-subunit (dnaE915) and either chromosomal or plasmid-borne dinB alleles. We hypothesized that dnaE915 cells would respond to DinB overproduction differently from dnaE(+) cells because the dnaE915 allele is known to have an altered genetic interaction with dinB(+) compared to its interaction with dnaE(+). Notably, we observe a loss-of-survival phenotype in dnaE915 strains with either a chromosomal catalytically inactive dinB(D103N) allele or a low-copy-number plasmid-borne dinB(+) upon DNA damage treatment. Furthermore, we find that the loss-of-survival phenotype occurs independently of DNA damage treatment in a dnaE915 strain expressing the catalytically inactive dinB(D103N) allele from a low-copy-number plasmid. The selective pressure imposed resulted in suppressor mutations that eliminated growth defects. The dinB intragenic mutations examined were either base pair substitutions or those that we inferred to be loss of function (i.e., deletions and insertions). Further analyses of selected novel dinB alleles, generated by single-base-pair substitutions in the dnaE915 strain, indicated that these no longer effect loss of survival upon overproduction in dnaE(+) strains. These mutations are mapped to specific areas of DinB; this permits us to gain insights into the mechanisms underlying the DinB-mediated overproduction loss-of-survival phenotype.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24914188      PMCID: PMC4135642          DOI: 10.1128/JB.01782-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  40 in total

1.  Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV), but not Pol II, dynamically switches with a stalled Pol III* replicase.

Authors:  Justin M H Heltzel; Robert W Maul; David W Wolff; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  SOE-LRed: A simple and time-efficient method to localize genes with point mutations onto the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  Ryan W Benson; Tiziana M Cafarelli; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Involvement of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV in tolerance of cytotoxic alkylating DNA lesions in vivo.

Authors:  Ivana Bjedov; Chitralekha Nag Dasgupta; Dea Slade; Sophie Le Blastier; Marjorie Selva; Ivan Matic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Translesion DNA polymerases remodel the replisome and alter the speed of the replicative helicase.

Authors:  Chiara Indiani; Lance D Langston; Olga Yurieva; Myron F Goodman; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The base substitution and frameshift fidelity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme in vitro.

Authors:  P T Pham; M W Olson; C S McHenry; R M Schaaper
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-09-04       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Comparative gene expression profiles following UV exposure in wild-type and SOS-deficient Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Courcelle; A Khodursky; B Peter; P O Brown; P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Oxidation of the guanine nucleotide pool underlies cell death by bactericidal antibiotics.

Authors:  James J Foti; Babho Devadoss; Jonathan A Winkler; James J Collins; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Antibiotic resistance acquired through a DNA damage-inducible response in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Matthew D Norton; Allison J Spilkia; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Inhibition of mutation and combating the evolution of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Ryan T Cirz; Jodie K Chin; David R Andes; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; William A Craig; Floyd E Romesberg
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  Compartmentalization of the replication fork by single-stranded DNA-binding protein regulates translesion synthesis.

Authors:  Seungwoo Chang; Elizabeth S Thrall; Luisa Laureti; Sadie C Piatt; Vincent Pagès; Joseph J Loparo
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 18.361

2.  A Genetic Selection for dinB Mutants Reveals an Interaction between DNA Polymerase IV and the Replicative Polymerase That Is Required for Translesion Synthesis.

Authors:  Michelle K Scotland; Justin M H Heltzel; James E Kath; Jung-Suk Choi; Anthony J Berdis; Joseph J Loparo; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.917

3.  DNA polymerase IV primarily operates outside of DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sarah S Henrikus; Elizabeth A Wood; John P McDonald; Michael M Cox; Roger Woodgate; Myron F Goodman; Antoine M van Oijen; Andrew Robinson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  RNA Primer Extension Hinders DNA Synthesis by Escherichia coli Mutagenic DNA Polymerase IV.

Authors:  Tommy F Tashjian; Ida Lin; Verena Belt; Tiziana M Cafarelli; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Identification of β Clamp-DNA Interaction Regions That Impair the Ability of E. coli to Tolerate Specific Classes of DNA Damage.

Authors:  Michael T Nanfara; Vignesh M P Babu; Mohamed A Ghazy; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.