Literature DB >> 29301907

Selection-Enhanced Mutagenesis of lac Genes Is Due to Their Coamplification with dinB Encoding an Error-Prone DNA Polymerase.

Itsugo Yamayoshi1, Sophie Maisnier-Patin1, John R Roth1.   

Abstract

To test whether growth limitation induces mutations, Cairns and Foster constructed an Escherichia coli strain whose mutant lac allele provides 1-2% of normal ability to use lactose. This strain cannot grow on lactose, but produces ∼50 Lac+ revertant colonies per 108 plated cells over 5 days. About 80% of revertants carry a stable lac+ mutation made by the error-prone DinB polymerase, which may be induced during growth limitation; 10% of Lac+ revertants are stable but form without DinB; and the remaining 10% grow by amplifying their mutant lac allele and are unstably Lac+ Induced DinB mutagenesis has been explained in two ways: (1) upregulation of dinB expression in nongrowing cells ("stress-induced mutagenesis") or (2) selected local overreplication of the lac and dinB+ genes on lactose medium (selected amplification) in cells that are not dividing. Transcription of dinB is necessary but not sufficient for mutagenesis. Evidence is presented that DinB enhances reversion only when encoded somewhere on the F'lac plasmid that carries the mutant lac gene. A new model will propose that rare preexisting cells (1 in a 1000) have ∼10 copies of the F'lac plasmid, providing them with enough energy to divide, mate, and overreplicate their F'lac plasmid under selective conditions. In these clones, repeated replication of F'lac in nondividing cells directs opportunities for lac reversion and increases the copy number of the dinB+ gene. Amplification of dinB+ increases the error rate of replication and increases the number of lac+ revertants. Thus, reversion is enhanced in nondividing cells not by stress-induced mutagenesis, but by selected coamplification of the dinB and lac genes, both of which happen to lie on the F'lac plasmid.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; adaptive mutation; copy number variant; dinB; error-prone polymerase; gene amplification; lactose operon; local overreplication; mutagenesis; plasmid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29301907      PMCID: PMC5844319          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  51 in total

1.  The SOS response regulates adaptive mutation.

Authors:  G J McKenzie; R S Harris; P L Lee; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptive mutation: how growth under selection stimulates Lac(+) reversion by increasing target copy number.

Authors:  John R Roth; Dan I Andersson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Error-prone DNA polymerase IV is controlled by the stress-response sigma factor, RpoS, in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jill C Layton; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 4.  Stress responses and genetic variation in bacteria.

Authors:  Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Involvement of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV in tolerance of cytotoxic alkylating DNA lesions in vivo.

Authors:  Ivana Bjedov; Chitralekha Nag Dasgupta; Dea Slade; Sophie Le Blastier; Marjorie Selva; Ivan Matic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Duplication frequency in a population of Salmonella enterica rapidly approaches steady state with or without recombination.

Authors:  Andrew B Reams; Eric Kofoid; Michael Savageau; John R Roth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The origin of mutants.

Authors:  J Cairns; J Overbaugh; S Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Recombineering: genetic engineering in bacteria using homologous recombination.

Authors:  Lynn C Thomason; James A Sawitzke; Xintian Li; Nina Costantino; Donald L Court
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2014-04-14

9.  Adaptive reversion of an episomal frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli requires conjugal functions but not actual conjugation.

Authors:  P L Foster; J M Trimarchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Amplification-mutagenesis: evidence that "directed" adaptive mutation and general hypermutability result from growth with a selected gene amplification.

Authors:  Heather Hendrickson; E Susan Slechta; Ulfar Bergthorsson; Dan I Andersson; John R Roth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Selection and Plasmid Transfer Underlie Adaptive Mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sophie Maisnier-Patin; John R Roth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Selective Inbreeding: Genetic Crosses Drive Apparent Adaptive Mutation in the Cairns-Foster System of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Amanda Nguyen; Sophie Maisnier-Patin; Itsugo Yamayoshi; Eric Kofoid; John R Roth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Transposable element insertions in fission yeast drive adaptation to environmental stress.

Authors:  Caroline Esnault; Michael Lee; Chloe Ham; Henry L Levin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 9.043

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.