Literature DB >> 19096731

Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner.

Adam M Alessio1, Ruth E Schmitz, Lawrence R Macdonald, Scott D Wollenweber, Charles W Stearns, Steven G Ross, Alex Ganin, Thomas K Lewellen, Paul E Kinahan.   

Abstract

Partially collimated PET systems have less collimation than conventional 2-D systems and have been shown to offer count rate improvements over 2-D and 3-D systems. Despite this potential, previous efforts have not established image-based improvements with partial collimation and have not customized the reconstruction method for partially collimated data. This work presents an image reconstruction method tailored for partially collimated data. Simulated and measured sensitivity patterns are presented and provide a basis for modification of a fully 3-D reconstruction technique. The proposed method uses a measured normalization correction term to account for the unique sensitivity to true events. This work also proposes a modified scatter correction based on simulated data. Measured image quality data supports the use of the normalization correction term for true events, and suggests that the modified scatter correction is unnecessary.

Year:  2008        PMID: 19096731      PMCID: PMC2605072          DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2008.921938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  12 in total

1.  A 2D/3D hybrid PET scanner with rotating partial slice-septa and its quantitative procedures.

Authors:  E Tanaka; T Hasegawa; T Yamashita; H Okada; H Murayama
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Count-Rate Performance of the Discovery STE PET Scanner Using Partial Collimation.

Authors:  Lawrence R Macdonald; Ruth E Schmitz; Adam M Alessio; Scott D Wollenweber; Charles W Stearns; Alexander Ganin; Robert L Harrison; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2006

3.  Optimization of noise equivalent count rate performance for a partially collimated PET scanner by varying the number of septa.

Authors:  Ruth E Schmitz; Robert L Harrison; Charles W Stearns; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data.

Authors:  H M Hudson; R S Larkin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A normalization technique for 3D PET data.

Authors:  M Defrise; D W Townsend; D Bailey; A Geissbuhler; C Michel; T Jones
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Model-based scatter correction for fully 3D PET.

Authors:  J M Ollinger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Noise characteristics of 3-D and 2-D PET images.

Authors:  S Pajevic; M E Daube-Witherspoon; S L Bacharach; R E Carson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Algorithms for calculating detector efficiency normalization coefficients for true coincidences in 3D PET.

Authors:  R D Badawi; M A Lodge; P K Marsden
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration.

Authors:  M E Casey; E J Hoffman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Collimator optimization for lesion detection incorporating prior information about lesion size.

Authors:  S C Moore; D J deVries; B Nandram; M F Kijewski; S P Mueller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes.

Authors:  L R Macdonald; R E Schmitz; A M Alessio; S D Wollenweber; C W Stearns; A Ganin; R L Harrison; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.

Authors:  L R MacDonald; R L Harrison; A M Alessio; W C J Hunter; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.