Literature DB >> 17649907

Optimization of noise equivalent count rate performance for a partially collimated PET scanner by varying the number of septa.

Ruth E Schmitz1, Robert L Harrison, Charles W Stearns, Thomas K Lewellen, Paul E Kinahan.   

Abstract

We present a simulation study of the global count-rate performance of a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner with different levels of partial collimation to maximize the noise equivalent count rate for whole-body PET imaging. We achieve partial collimation by removing different numbers of septal rings from the standard 2-D septa set for the GE Advance PET scanner. System behavior is studied with a photon tracking simulation package, which we modify to enable the production of random coincidences. The simulations are validated with measured data taken in 2-D and fully 3-D acquisition mode on a GE Advance system using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-2 count-rate phantom with two sets of annular sleeves to expand the diameter to 27 and 35 cm. For all diameters and in 2-D and fully 3-D mode, there is good agreement between measurements and simulations. All studies use the three phantom diameters to evaluate the effect of patient thickness for each amount of collimation. Optimized system parameters, such as maximum ring difference for single slice rebinning, are determined for the five partially collimated systems considered. The resulting global count rates for true, scattered, and random coincidences, the noise equivalent count (NEC) rates, and the scatter fractions for different levels of collimation are compared along with the results from the conventional 2-D and fully 3-D modes. Improved statistical data quality relative to both 2-D and fully 3-D data is found with the partially collimated systems, particularly when one-half or two-thirds of the septal rings are removed. An increase in NEC rates of as much as 50% is found for clinically relevant activities between 5-10 mCi (184-370 MBq). Scatter fractions for the partially collimated systems are intermediate between the 2-D and fully 3-D numbers. Many factors that affect image quality have not been considered in this paper. However, the significant increase in statistical data quality warrants further investigation of the impact of partial collimation on clinical whole-body PET imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17649907      PMCID: PMC2592607          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2007.895485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  10 in total

1.  Randoms variance reduction in 3D PET.

Authors:  R D Badawi; M P Miller; D L Bailey; P K Marsden
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  [Reduction of radiation exposure in PET examinations by data acquisition in the 3D mode].

Authors:  G Brix; L E Adam; J Zaers; H Trojan; M E Bellemann; D Nosske; J Doll
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.379

3.  Optimization of injected dose based on noise equivalent count rates for 2- and 3-dimensional whole-body PET.

Authors:  Carole Lartizien; Claude Comtat; Paul E Kinahan; Nuno Ferreira; Bernard Bendriem; Régine Trébossen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Survey of parallel slat collimator designs for hybrid PET imaging.

Authors:  T C Rust; D J Kadrmas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulations of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners.

Authors:  C Ross Schmidtlein; Assen S Kirov; Sadek A Nehmeh; Yusuf E Erdi; John L Humm; Howard I Amols; Luc M Bidaut; Alex Ganin; Charles W Stearns; David L McDaniel; Klaus A Hamacher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Capabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom study.

Authors:  R R Raylman; P V Kison; R L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-01

7.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration.

Authors:  M E Casey; E J Hoffman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner.

Authors:  T R DeGrado; T G Turkington; J J Williams; C W Stearns; J M Hoffman; R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies.

Authors:  J R Votaw; M White
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Quantitative Brain PET. Comparison of 2D and 3D Acquisitions on the GE Advance Scanner.

Authors:  Vijay Dhawan; Ken Kazumata; William Robeson; Abdelfatihe Belakhlef; Claude Margouleff; Thomas Chaly; Toshitaka Nakamura; Robert Dahl; Donald Margouleff; David Eidelberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1998-03
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Ruth E Schmitz; Lawrence R Macdonald; Scott D Wollenweber; Charles W Stearns; Steven G Ross; Alex Ganin; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.679

2.  Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes.

Authors:  L R Macdonald; R E Schmitz; A M Alessio; S D Wollenweber; C W Stearns; A Ganin; R L Harrison; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.

Authors:  L R MacDonald; R L Harrison; A M Alessio; W C J Hunter; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.