Literature DB >> 21526138

SPEECH PERCEPTION AS A TALKER-CONTINGENT PROCESS.

Lynne C Nygaard1, Mitchell S Sommers, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

To determine how familiarity with a talker's voice affects perception of spoken words, we trained two groups of subjects to recognize a set of voices over a 9-day period. One group then identified novel words produced by the same set of talkers at four signal-to-noise ratios. Control subjects identified the same words produced by a different set of talkers. The results showed that the ability to identify a talker's voice improved intelligibility of novel words produced by that talker. The results suggest that speech perception may involve talker-contingent processes whereby perceptual learning of aspects of the vocal source facilitates the subsequent phonetic analysis of the acoustic signal.

Year:  1994        PMID: 21526138      PMCID: PMC3081685          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00612.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  12 in total

Review 1.  Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.

Authors:  T M Nearey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel.

Authors:  J D Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.

Authors:  C S Martin; J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; W V Summers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Pattern-analyzing memory.

Authors:  P A Kolers
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists.

Authors:  S D Goldinger; D B Pisoni; J S Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-04

7.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

10.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Authors:  K N Stevens; S E Blumstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  131 in total

1.  Name that tune: identifying popular recordings from brief excerpts.

Authors:  E G Schellenberg; P Iverson; M C McKinnon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02

4.  Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice.

Authors:  Lynne C Nygaard; Erin R Lunders
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

5.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?

Authors:  Susannah V Levi; Stephen J Winters; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Talker-identification training using simulations of binaurally combined electric and acoustic hearing: generalization to speech and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Vidya Krull; Xin Luo; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.