Literature DB >> 2345691

Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception.

J W Mullennix1, D B Pisoni.   

Abstract

Processing dependencies in speech perception between voice and phoneme were investigated using the Garner (1974) speeded classification procedure. Variability in the voice of the talker and in the cues to word-initial consonants were manipulated. The results showed that the processing of a talker's voice and the perception of voicing are asymmetrically dependent. In addition, when stimulus variability was increased in each dimension, the amount of orthogonal interference obtained for each dimension became significantly larger. The processing asymmetry between voice and phoneme was interpreted in terms of a parallel-contingent relationship of talker normalization processes to auditory-to-phonetic coding processes. The processing of voice information appears to be qualitatively different from the encoding of segmental phonetic information, although they are not independent. Implications of these results for current theories of speech perception are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2345691      PMCID: PMC3512111          DOI: 10.3758/bf03210878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  ARTICULATION-TESTING METHODS: CONSONANTAL DIFFERENTIATION WITH A CLOSED-RESPONSE SET.

Authors:  A S HOUSE; C E WILLIAMS; M H HEKER; K D KRYTER
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.

Authors:  C S Martin; J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; W V Summers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Processing two dimensions of nonspeech stimuli: the auditory-phonetic distinction reconsidered.

Authors:  M J Blechner; R S Day; J E Cutting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Study of variations in the male and female glottal wave.

Authors:  R B Monsen; A M Engebretson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Integral processing of phonemes: evidence for a phonetic mode of perception.

Authors:  G R Tomiak; J W Mullennix; J R Sawusch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Interactions in processing segmental and suprasegmental features of speech.

Authors:  J L Mller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-08

8.  Vowel identification: orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic aspects.

Authors:  P F Assmann; T M Nearey; J T Hogan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Some perceptual dependencies in speeded classification of vowel color and pitch.

Authors:  T D Carrell; L B Smith; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-01

10.  Asymmetric dependencies in processing phonetic features.

Authors:  P D Eimas; V C Tartter; J L Miller; N J Keuthen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-01
View more
  69 in total

1.  Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02

2.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Cross-modal source information and spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?

Authors:  Susannah V Levi; Stephen J Winters; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report.

Authors:  J S Logan; S E Lively; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Eye movements reveal fast, voice-specific priming.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01-04

8.  Another bilingual advantage? Perception of talker-voice information.

Authors:  Susannahv Levi
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2017-06-09

9.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Dyslexia Limits the Ability to Categorize Talker Dialect.

Authors:  Gayle Beam Long; Robert Allen Fox; Ewa Jacewicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.