Literature DB >> 12542137

Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Sonya M Sheffert1, David B Pisoni, Jennifer M Fellowes, Robert E Remez.   

Abstract

In 5 experiments, the authors investigated how listeners learn to recognize unfamiliar talkers and how experience with specific utterances generalizes to novel instances. Listeners were trained over several days to identify 10 talkers from natural, sinewave, or reversed speech sentences. The sinewave signals preserved phonetic and some suprasegmental properties while eliminating natural vocal quality. In contrast, the reversed speech signals preserved vocal quality while distorting temporally based phonetic properties. The training results indicate that listeners learned to identify talkers even from acoustic signals lacking natural vocal quality. Generalization performance varied across the different signals and depended on the salience of phonetic information. The results suggest similarities in the phonetic attributes underlying talker recognition and phonetic perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12542137      PMCID: PMC3433715     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  55 in total

1.  Vowel judgements and adaptation level.

Authors:  D E BROADBENT; P LADEFOGED
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1960-02-02

2.  Identifiability of vowels and speakers from whispered syllables.

Authors:  V C Tartter
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-04

3.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.

Authors:  C S Martin; J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; W V Summers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Contributions of surface and conceptual information to recognition memory.

Authors:  S M Sheffert
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-10

5.  Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; L C Nygaard; W A Howell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Speech characteristics of male-to-female transsexuals: a perceptual and acoustic study.

Authors:  L E Spencer
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1988

7.  Voice identification by nursery school children.

Authors:  B Bartholomeus
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1973-12

8.  Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms.

Authors:  A R Damasio; H Damasio; G W Van Hoesen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Impairment of voice and face recognition in patients with hemispheric damage.

Authors:  D R Van Lancker; G J Canter
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Phonagnosia: a dissociation between familiar and unfamiliar voices.

Authors:  D R Van Lancker; J L Cummings; J Kreiman; B H Dobkin
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  30 in total

1.  Can you McGurk yourself? Self-face and self-voice in audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Christopher Aruffo; David I Shore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-20

3.  Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

Review 4.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Learned face-voice pairings facilitate visual search.

Authors:  L Jacob Zweig; Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

6.  Perceptual dialect categorization by an adult cochlear implant user: a case study.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Int Congr Ser       Date:  2004-11-01

Review 7.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.

Authors:  Gregory Sell; Clara Suied; Mounya Elhilali; Shihab Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Electrophysiological correlates of voice learning and recognition.

Authors:  Romi Zäske; Gregor Volberg; Gyula Kovács; Stefan Robert Schweinberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Cara E Stepp; Robert E Hillman; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.