Literature DB >> 2659639

Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel.

J D Miller1.   

Abstract

The major issues in relating acoustic waveforms of spoken vowels to perceived vowel categories are presented and discussed in terms of the author's auditory-perceptual theory of phonetic recognition. A brief historical review of formant-ratio theory is presented, as well as an analysis of frequency scales that have been proposed for description of the vowel. It is illustrated that the monophthongal vowel sounds of American English can be represented as clustered in perceptual target zones within a three-dimensional auditory-perceptual space (APS), and it is shown that preliminary versions of these target zones segregate a corpus of vowels of American English with 93% accuracy. Furthermore, it is shown that the nonretroflex vowels of American English fall within a narrow slab within the APS, with spread vowels near the front of this slab and rounded vowels near the back. Retroflex vowels fall in a distinct region behind the vowel slab. Descriptions of the vowels within the APS are shown to be correlated with their descriptions in terms of dimensions of articulation and timbre. Additionally, issues related to talker normalization, coarticulation effects, segmentation, pitch, transposition, and diphthongization are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2659639     DOI: 10.1121/1.397862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Speech enhancement for listeners with hearing loss based on a model for vowel coding in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Akshay Rao; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Jessica E D Alexander; Sabrina K Sidaras; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production.

Authors:  Frank H Guenther; Satrajit S Ghosh; Jason A Tourville
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect.

Authors:  K P Green; P K Kuhl; A N Meltzoff; E B Stevens
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-12

7.  Effects of spectral modulation filtering on vowel identification.

Authors:  Chang Liu; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  SPEECH PERCEPTION AS A TALKER-CONTINGENT PROCESS.

Authors:  Lynne C Nygaard; Mitchell S Sommers; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  1994-01-01

9.  Perceptive significance of frequency and amplitude characteristics of vowels with difference fundamental frequency.

Authors:  N G Andreeva; G A Kulikov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

10.  Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.