Literature DB >> 2659638

Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.

T M Nearey1.   

Abstract

The present work reviews theories and empirical findings, including results from two new experiments, that bear on the perception of English vowels, with an emphasis on the comparison of data analytic "machine recognition" approaches with results from speech perception experiments. Two major sources of variability (viz., speaker differences and consonantal context effects) are addressed from the classical perspective of overlap between vowel categories in F1 x F2 space. Various approaches to the reduction of this overlap are evaluated. Two types of speaker normalization are considered. "Intrinsic" methods based on relationships among the steady-state properties (F0, F1, F2, and F3) within individual vowel tokens are contrasted with "extrinsic" methods, involving the relationships among the formant frequencies of the entire vowel system of a single speaker. Evidence from a new experiment supports Ainsworth's (1975) conclusion [W. Ainsworth, Auditory Analysis and Perception of Speech (Academic, London, 1975)] that both types of information have a role to play in perception. The effects of consonantal context on formant overlap are also considered. A new experiment is presented that extends Lindblom and Studdert-Kennedy's finding [B. Lindblom and M. Studdert-Kennedy, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43, 840-843 (1967)] of perceptual effects of consonantal context on vowel perception to /dVd/ and /bVb/ contexts. Finally, the role of vowel-inherent dynamic properties, including duration and diphthongization, is briefly reviewed. All of the above factors are shown to have reliable influences on vowel perception, although the relative weight of such effects and the circumstances that alter these weights remain far from clear. It is suggested that the design of more complex perceptual experiments, together with the development of quantitative pattern recognition models of human vowel perception, will be necessary to resolve these issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2659638     DOI: 10.1121/1.397861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  64 in total

1.  Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02

2.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Identification of synthetic vowels based on a time-varying model of the vocal tract area function.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kelly Tremblay; Christopher G Clinard; Richard A Wright; Elad Sagi; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Quantitative and descriptive comparison of four acoustic analysis systems: vowel measurements.

Authors:  Carlyn Burris; Houri K Vorperian; Marios Fourakis; Ray D Kent; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Vowel acoustics in dysarthria: mapping to perception.

Authors:  Kaitlin L Lansford; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.

Authors:  Ja Young Choi; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

Review 8.  Representation and integration of auditory and visual stimuli in the primate ventral lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Lizabeth M Romanski
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Zebra finches exhibit speaker-independent phonetic perception of human speech.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Arike Gill; Caroline A A Van Heijningen; Gabriel J L Beckers; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.