Literature DB >> 20968380

Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail.

Rachel M Theodore1, Joanne L Miller.   

Abstract

Previous research shows that listeners are sensitive to talker differences in phonetic properties of speech, including voice-onset-time (VOT) in word-initial voiceless stop consonants, and that learning how a talker produces one voiceless stop transfers to another word with the same voiceless stop [Allen, J. S., and Miller, J. L. (2004). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 3171-3183]. The present experiments examined whether transfer extends to words that begin with different voiceless stops. During training, listeners heard two talkers produce a given voiceless-initial word (e.g., pain). VOTs were manipulated such that one talker produced the voiceless stop with relatively short VOTs and the other with relatively long VOTs. At test, listeners heard a short- and long-VOT variant of the same word (e.g., pain) or a word beginning with a different voiceless stop (e.g., cane or coal), and were asked to select which of the two VOT variants was most representative of a given talker. In all conditions, which variant was selected at test was in line with listeners' exposure during training, and the effect was equally strong for the novel word and the training word. These findings suggest that accommodating talker-specific phonetic detail does not require exposure to each individual phonetic segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968380      PMCID: PMC2981121          DOI: 10.1121/1.3467771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: a distinction between lexical status and speaking rate.

Authors:  J S Allen; J L Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

2.  Surface form typicality and asymmetric transfer in episodic memory for spoken words.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; S A Burt; J S Queen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

Authors:  J Sean Allen; Joanne L Miller; David DeSteno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory priming: implicit and explicit memory for words and voices.

Authors:  D L Schacter; B A Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

Authors:  J Sean Allen; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual learning in speech.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

9.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.

Authors:  J L Miller; L E Volaitis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-12

10.  Phonetic prototypes.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04
View more
  17 in total

1.  Contextual Influences on Phonetic Categorization in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Jean A Campbell; Heather L McSherry; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Front Commun (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-19

2.  Individual differences in learning talker categories: the role of working memory.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Julie Case; Scott Seyfarth; Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Perception of local and non-local vowels by adults and children in the South.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert Allen Fox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Attention modulates specificity effects in spoken word recognition: Challenges to the time-course hypothesis.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Sheila E Blumstein; Sahil Luthra
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Voice-sensitive brain networks encode talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Language Ability and the Familiar Talker Advantage: Generalizing to Unfamiliar Talkers Is What Matters.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi; Daphna Harel; Richard G Schwartz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  More than a boundary shift: Perceptual adaptation to foreign-accented speech reshapes the internal structure of phonetic categories.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Rachel M Theodore; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Cara E Stepp; Robert E Hillman; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Nicholas R Monto
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.