Literature DB >> 21508243

Visual search demands dictate reliance on working memory storage.

Roy Luria1, Edward K Vogel.   

Abstract

Previous research suggested that working memory (WM) does not play any significant role in visual search. In three experiments, we investigated the search difficulty and individual differences in WM capacity as determinants of WM involvement during visual search tasks, using both behavioral and electrophysiological markers [i.e., the contralateral delay activity (CDA), which is a marker for WM capacity allocation]. Human participants performed a visual search task that contained a target, neutral distractors, and a flanker distractor. Overall, we found that, as the search difficulty increased (as indicated by longer reaction times), so did the role of WM in performing the search task (as indicated by larger CDA amplitudes). Moreover, the results pinpoint a dissociation between the two types of factors that determined the WM involvement in the search process. Namely, individual differences in WM capacity and search difficulty independently affected the degree to which the search process relied on WM. Instead of showing a progressive role, individual differences in WM capacity correlated with the search efficiency in all search conditions (i.e., easy, medium, and difficult). Counterintuitively, individuals with high WM capacity generally relied less on WM during the search task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21508243      PMCID: PMC3758569          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6453-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Aleksandra Hirst; Jan W de Fockert; Essi Viding
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

5.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E J Sirevaag; C W Eriksen; E Donchin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Cuing interacts with perceptual load in visual search.

Authors:  Douglas N Johnson; Allison McGrath; Carrie McNeil
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-05

7.  Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-10

8.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

10.  The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Sei-Hwan Oh; Min-Shik Kim
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04
View more
  24 in total

1.  Improvement in visual search with practice: mapping learning-related changes in neurocognitive stages of processing.

Authors:  Kait Clark; L Gregory Appelbaum; Berry van den Berg; Stephen R Mitroff; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Markus Conci; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Infra-slow EEG fluctuations are correlated with resting-state network dynamics in fMRI.

Authors:  Tuija Hiltunen; Jussi Kantola; Ahmed Abou Elseoud; Pasi Lepola; Kalervo Suominen; Tuomo Starck; Juha Nikkinen; Jukka Remes; Osmo Tervonen; Satu Palva; Vesa Kiviniemi; J Matias Palva
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Lauren H Williams; Trafton Drew
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?

Authors:  Hanna Benoni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

7.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The development of organized visual search.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Tilbe Göksun; Anjan Chatterjee; Sarah Zelonis; Anika Mehta; Sabrina E Smith
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-04-11

9.  Distinct neural mechanisms for spatially lateralized and spatially global visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Min-Suk Kang; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Strengthened effective connectivity underlies transfer of working memory training to tests of short-term memory and attention.

Authors:  Bornali Kundu; David W Sutterer; Stephen M Emrich; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.