Literature DB >> 15355143

Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

Nilli Lavie1, Aleksandra Hirst, Jan W de Fockert, Essi Viding.   

Abstract

A load theory of attention in which distractor rejection depends on the level and type of load involved in current processing was tested. A series of experiments demonstrates that whereas high perceptual load reduces distractor interference, working memory load or dual-task coordination load increases distractor interference. These findings suggest 2 selective attention mechanisms: a perceptual selection mechanism serving to reduce distractor perception in situations of high perceptual load that exhaust perceptual capacity in processing relevant stimuli and a cognitive control mechanism that reduces interference from perceived distractors as long as cognitive control functions are available to maintain current priorities (low cognitive load). This theory resolves the long-standing early versus late selection debate and clarifies the role of cognitive control in selective attention. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15355143     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  358 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Just another social scene: evidence for decreased attention to negative social scenes in high-functioning autism.

Authors:  Andreia Santos; Thierry Chaminade; David Da Fonseca; Catarina Silva; Delphine Rosset; Christine Deruelle
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-09

4.  Childhood trauma history differentiates amygdala response to sad faces within MDD.

Authors:  Merida M Grant; Christopher Cannistraci; Steven D Hollon; John Gore; Richard Shelton
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.791

5.  Does high memory load kick task-irrelevant information out of visual working memory?

Authors:  Jun Yin; Jifan Zhou; Haokui Xu; Junying Liang; Zaifeng Gao; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

6.  Dissociable mechanisms supporting awareness: the P300 and gamma in a linguistic attentional blink task.

Authors:  Laura Batterink; Christina M Karns; Helen Neville
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  The contribution of working memory to divided attention.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Working memory demands modulate cognitive control in the Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-06

9.  Positive emotion broadens attention focus through decreased position-specific spatial encoding in early visual cortex: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Naomi Vanlessen; Valentina Rossi; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 10.  Affective Working Memory: An Integrative Psychological Construct.

Authors:  Joseph A Mikels; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.