Literature DB >> 25834059

Improvement in visual search with practice: mapping learning-related changes in neurocognitive stages of processing.

Kait Clark1, L Gregory Appelbaum2, Berry van den Berg3, Stephen R Mitroff4, Marty G Woldorff5.   

Abstract

Practice can improve performance on visual search tasks; the neural mechanisms underlying such improvements, however, are not clear. Response time typically shortens with practice, but which components of the stimulus-response processing chain facilitate this behavioral change? Improved search performance could result from enhancements in various cognitive processing stages, including (1) sensory processing, (2) attentional allocation, (3) target discrimination, (4) motor-response preparation, and/or (5) response execution. We measured event-related potentials (ERPs) as human participants completed a five-day visual-search protocol in which they reported the orientation of a color popout target within an array of ellipses. We assessed changes in behavioral performance and in ERP components associated with various stages of processing. After practice, response time decreased in all participants (while accuracy remained consistent), and electrophysiological measures revealed modulation of several ERP components. First, amplitudes of the early sensory-evoked N1 component at 150 ms increased bilaterally, indicating enhanced visual sensory processing of the array. Second, the negative-polarity posterior-contralateral component (N2pc, 170-250 ms) was earlier and larger, demonstrating enhanced attentional orienting. Third, the amplitude of the sustained posterior contralateral negativity component (SPCN, 300-400 ms) decreased, indicating facilitated target discrimination. Finally, faster motor-response preparation and execution were observed after practice, as indicated by latency changes in both the stimulus-locked and response-locked lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs). These electrophysiological results delineate the functional plasticity in key mechanisms underlying visual search with high temporal resolution and illustrate how practice influences various cognitive and neural processing stages leading to enhanced behavioral performance.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/355351-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; LRP; N2pc; attention; learning; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25834059      PMCID: PMC4381005          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1152-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  22 in total

Review 1.  Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition.

Authors:  M G Coles
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming.

Authors:  G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task.

Authors:  Pierre Jolicoeur; Benoit Brisson; Nicolas Robitaille
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Perceptual learning in visual search: fast, enduring, but non-specific.

Authors:  R Sireteanu; R Rettenbach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The temporal dynamics of the effects in occipital cortex of visual-spatial selective attention.

Authors:  M G Woldorff; M Liotti; M Seabolt; L Busse; J L Lancaster; P T Fox
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-12

9.  Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Vincent Di Lollo; John J McDonald
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Visual search elicits the electrophysiological marker of visual working memory.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Jay Pratt; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.

Authors:  Gerard Derosiere; Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Sylvie Nozaradan; Alexandre Zénon; André Mouraux; Julie Duque
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Personality correlates of individual differences in the recruitment of cognitive mechanisms when rewards are at stake.

Authors:  Allan J Heritage; Laura J Long; Geoffrey F Woodman; David H Zald
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  The influence of category representativeness on the low prevalence effect in visual search.

Authors:  Ryan E O'Donnell; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-22

4.  Intensity- and timing-dependent modulation of motion perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex.

Authors:  Olga Lucia Gamboa Arana; Hannah Palmer; Moritz Dannhauer; Connor Hile; Sicong Liu; Rena Hamdan; Alexandra Brito; Roberto Cabeza; Simon W Davis; Angel V Peterchev; Marc A Sommer; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Visual search performance is predicted by both prestimulus and poststimulus electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Berry van den Berg; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Kait Clark; Monicque M Lorist; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Anna Byers; John T Serences
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Learning-Related Brain-Electrical Activity Dynamics Associated with the Subsequent Impact of Learnt Action-Outcome Associations.

Authors:  Fabian Baum; Uta Wolfensteller; Hannes Ruge
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Visual expertise modulates baseline brain activity: a preliminary resting-state fMRI study using expertise model of radiologists.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Minghao Dong; Hongmei Wang; Rui Jia; Fu Li; Xiaoli Ni; Chenwang Jin
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Changes of Attention during Value-Based Reversal Learning Are Tracked by N2pc and Feedback-Related Negativity.

Authors:  Mariann Oemisch; Marcus R Watson; Thilo Womelsdorf; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Sustaining Attention for a Prolonged Duration Affects Dynamic Organizations of Frequency-Specific Functional Connectivity.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Yongjie Zhu; Hongjin Sun; Tapani Ristaniemi; Fengyu Cong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.