Literature DB >> 24599946

More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Joseph Schmidt1, Annmarie MacNamara, Greg Hajcak Proudfit, Gregory J Zelinsky.   

Abstract

The visual-search literature has assumed that the top-down target representation used to guide search resides in visual working memory (VWM). We directly tested this assumption using contralateral delay activity (CDA) to estimate the VWM load imposed by the target representation. In Experiment 1, observers previewed four photorealistic objects and were cued to remember the two objects appearing to the left or right of central fixation; Experiment 2 was identical except that observers previewed two photorealistic objects and were cued to remember one. CDA was measured during a delay following preview offset but before onset of a four-object search array. One of the targets was always present, and observers were asked to make an eye movement to it and press a button. We found lower magnitude CDA on trials when the initial search saccade was directed to the target (strong guidance) compared to when it was not (weak guidance). This difference also tended to be larger shortly before search-display onset and was largely unaffected by VWM item-capacity limits or number of previews. Moreover, the difference between mean strong- and weak-guidance CDA was proportional to the increase in search time between mean strong-and weak-guidance trials (as measured by time-to-target and reaction-time difference scores). Contrary to most search models, our data suggest that trials resulting in the maintenance of more target features results in poor search guidance to a target. We interpret these counterintuitive findings as evidence for strong search guidance using a small set of highly discriminative target features that remain after pruning from a larger set of features, with the load imposed on VWM varying with this feature-consolidation process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contralateral delay activity (CDA); event-related potentials (ERPs); guidance; target representation; visual search; visual working memory (VWM); visual working memory capacity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24599946      PMCID: PMC3944715          DOI: 10.1167/14.3.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  46 in total

1.  Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Jay Pratt; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Contralateral delay activity tracks object identity information in visual short term memory.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Xiaotian Xu; Zhibo Chen; Jun Yin; Mowei Shen; Rende Shui
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Andrew W McCollough; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Visual search guidance is best after a short delay.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Visual search demands dictate reliance on working memory storage.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics.

Authors:  Lingyun Zhang; Matthew H Tong; Tim K Marks; Honghao Shan; Garrison W Cottrell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Searching Through the Hierarchy: How Level of Target Categorization Affects Visual Search.

Authors:  Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-11-12
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; James W Bisley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Are all real-world objects created equal? Estimating the "set-size" of the search target in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael T Miuccio; Gregory J Zelinsky; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Searching for Category-Consistent Features: A Computational Approach to Understanding Visual Category Representation.

Authors:  Chen-Ping Yu; Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-05-03

Review 4.  The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Halely Balaban; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Eye movements reflect expertise development in hybrid search.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Michael C Hout; Juan D Guevara Pinto; Arryn Robbins; Alexis Lopez
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-02-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.