Literature DB >> 25351495

Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.

Thomas Töllner1, Markus Conci, Hermann J Müller.   

Abstract

It is well established that we can focally attend to a specific region in visual space without shifting our eyes, so as to extract action-relevant sensory information from covertly attended locations. The underlying mechanisms that determine how fast we engage our attentional spotlight in visual-search scenarios, however, remain controversial. One dominant view advocated by perceptual decision-making models holds that the times taken for focal-attentional selection are mediated by an internal template that biases perceptual coding and selection decisions exclusively through target-defining feature coding. This notion directly predicts that search times remain unaffected whether or not participants can anticipate the upcoming distractor context. Here we tested this hypothesis by employing an illusory-figure localization task that required participants to search for an invariant target amongst a variable distractor context, which gradually changed--either randomly or predictably--as a function of distractor-target similarity. We observed a graded decrease in internal focal-attentional selection times--correlated with external behavioral latencies--for distractor contexts of higher relative to lower similarity to the target. Critically, for low but not intermediate and high distractor-target similarity, these context-driven effects were cortically and behaviorally amplified when participants could reliably predict the type of distractors. This interactive pattern demonstrates that search guidance signals can integrate information about distractor, in addition to target, identities to optimize distractor-target competition for focal-attentional selection.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distractor templates; electroencephalography; illusory figures; perceptual decision making; visual selective attention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25351495      PMCID: PMC6869454          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  55 in total

1.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  S Treue; J C Martínez Trujillo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Top-down signal from prefrontal cortex in executive control of memory retrieval.

Authors:  H Tomita; M Ohbayashi; K Nakahara; I Hasegawa; Y Miyashita
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects.

Authors:  R P Rao; D H Ballard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

5.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The time-course of global and local attentional guidance in Kanizsa-figure detection.

Authors:  Markus Conci; Thomas Töllner; Marcin Leszczynski; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Top-down dimensional weight set determines the capture of visual attention: evidence from the PCN component.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system.

Authors:  G Davis; J Driver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

10.  Search goal tunes visual features optimally.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  9 in total

1.  Gaze dynamics of feature-based distractor inhibition under prior-knowledge and expectations.

Authors:  Wen Wen; Yangming Zhang; Sheng Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Attentional weights in vision as products of spatial and nonspatial components.

Authors:  Maria Nordfang; Camilla Staugaard; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Contextual cueing in co-active visual search: Joint action allows acquisition of task-irrelevant context.

Authors:  Xuelian Zang; Artyom Zinchenko; Jiao Wu; Xiuna Zhu; Fang Fang; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Priming of probabilistic attentional templates.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  Temporal integration of feature probability distributions.

Authors:  Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; Sóley Þorsteinsdóttir; Joy J Geng; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-08

6.  Tracking neural markers of template formation and implementation in attentional inhibition under different distractor consistency.

Authors:  Wen Wen 雯文; Zhibang Huang 邦黄志; Yin Hou 寅侯; Sheng Li 晟李
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Gestalt Perceptual Organization of Visual Stimuli Captures Attention Automatically: Electrophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Different Measures of Structural Similarity Tap Different Aspects of Visual Object Processing.

Authors:  Christian Gerlach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-17

9.  Electrophysiological evidence for temporal dynamics associated with attentional processing in the zoom lens paradigm.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Tengfei Liang; Jiafeng Zhang; Xueying Fu; Jianlin Wu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.