Literature DB >> 15085132

Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Edward K Vogel1, Maro G Machizawa.   

Abstract

Contrary to our rich phenomenological visual experience, our visual short-term memory system can maintain representations of only three to four objects at any given moment. For over a century, the capacity of visual memory has been shown to vary substantially across individuals, ranging from 1.5 to about 5 objects. Although numerous studies have recently begun to characterize the neural substrates of visual memory processes, a neurophysiological index of storage capacity limitations has not yet been established. Here, we provide electrophysiological evidence for lateralized activity in humans that reflects the encoding and maintenance of items in visual memory. The amplitude of this activity is strongly modulated by the number of objects being held in the memory at the time, but approaches a limit asymptotically for arrays that meet or exceed storage capacity. Indeed, the precise limit is determined by each individual's memory capacity, such that the activity from low-capacity individuals reaches this plateau much sooner than that from high-capacity individuals. Consequently, this measure provides a strong neurophysiological predictor of an individual's capacity, allowing the demonstration of a direct relationship between neural activity and memory capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15085132     DOI: 10.1038/nature02447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  523 in total

1.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia contributions to visual working memory.

Authors:  Bradley Voytek; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Cognition in schizophrenia: core psychological and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Alan Ceaser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Working memory templates are maintained as feature-specific perceptual codes.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Deepak Sambhara; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Janowich; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

Authors:  J Scott Saults; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

7.  Moving to higher ground: The dynamic field theory and the dynamics of visual cognition.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2008-08

8.  Dynamic range of frontoparietal functional modulation is associated with working memory capacity limitations in older adults.

Authors:  Jonathan G Hakun; Nathan F Johnson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Edward Awh; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06

10.  Distinguishing cognitive effort and working memory load using scale-invariance and alpha suppression in EEG.

Authors:  Omid Kardan; Kirsten C S Adam; Irida Mance; Nathan W Churchill; Edward K Vogel; Marc G Berman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.