Literature DB >> 33000442

Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Lauren H Williams1, Trafton Drew2.   

Abstract

The presence of memory for rejected distractors during visual search has been heavily debated in the literature and has proven challenging to investigate behaviorally. In this research, we used an electrophysiological index of working memory (contralateral delay activity) to passively measure working memory activity during visual search. Participants were asked to indicate whether a novel target was present or absent in a lateralized search array with three visual set sizes (2, 4, or 6). If rejected distractors are maintained in working memory during search, working memory activity should increase with the number of distractors that need to be evaluated. Therefore, we predicted the amplitude of the contralateral delay activity would be larger for target-absent trials and would increase with visual set size until WM capacity was reached. In Experiment 1, we found no evidence for distractor maintenance in working memory during search for real-world stimuli. In Experiment 2, we found partial evidence in support of distractor maintenance during search for stimuli with high target/distractor similarity. In both experiments, working memory capacity did not appear to be a limiting factor during visual search. These results suggest the role of working memory during search may depend on the visual search task in question. Maintaining distractors in working memory appears to be unnecessary during search for realistic stimuli. However, there appears to be a limited role for distractor maintenance during search for artificial stimuli with a high degree of feature overlap.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrophysiology; Visual search; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33000442     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02127-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  38 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Active inhibition and memory promote exploration and search of natural scenes.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-02-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Estimating the statistical power to detect set-size effects in contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  William X Q Ngiam; Kirsten C S Adam; Colin Quirk; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.016

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.