Literature DB >> 21310945

Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture.

Keisuke Fukuda1, Edward K Vogel.   

Abstract

Working memory capacity reflects a core ability of the individual that affects performance on many cognitive tasks. Recent work has suggested that an important covariate of memory capacity is attentional control, and specifically that low-capacity individuals are more susceptible to attentional capture by distractors than high-capacity individuals are, with the latter being able to resist capture. Here, we tested an alternative account according to which all individuals are equally susceptible to attentional capture, but high-capacity individuals recover more quickly than low-capacity individuals. Using psychophysical and electrophysiological methods, we measured recovery time from attentional capture. In two experiments, we found that high- and low-capacity individuals showed equivalent attentional capture effects in the initial moments following capture, but that low-capacity individuals took much longer to recover than high-capacity individuals did. These results suggest that the poor attentional control associated with low capacity is due to slow disengagement from distractors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21310945      PMCID: PMC4494671          DOI: 10.1177/0956797611398493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  23 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Irrelevant singletons capture attention: evidence from inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Richard Godljn
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

3.  Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.

Authors:  M Kathryn Bleckley; Francis T Durso; Jerry M Crutchfield; Randall W Engle; Maya M Khanna
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

Review 4.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

5.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Encoding strategy and not visual working memory capacity correlates with intelligence.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; Manja Lehmann; Michele Veldsman; Daniel J Mitchell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

9.  Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Brian Barton; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07

10.  Human variation in overriding attentional capture.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  80 in total

1.  Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Kate A Yurgil; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Concrete mindset impairs filtering in visual working memory.

Authors:  Britt Hadar; Roy Luria; Nira Liberman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

3.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; Gregory J Christie; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicœur; John J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Monica L Faulkner; Jessica J Rilee; Steven Yantis; Cherie L Marvel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reward and attentional control in visual search.

Authors:  Steven Yantis; Brian A Anderson; Emma K Wampler; Patryk A Laurent
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

7.  The reliability and internal consistency of one-shot and flicker change detection for measuring individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Hrag Pailian; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

8.  Working memory training improves visual short-term memory capacity.

Authors:  Hillary Schwarb; Jayde Nail; Eric H Schumacher
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-02-06

9.  The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.

Authors:  Ariane Leão Caldas; Walter Machado-Pinheiro; Olga Daneyko; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-27

10.  Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging.

Authors:  Nathan Cashdollar; Keisuke Fukuda; Angelika Bocklage; Sara Aurtenetxe; Edward K Vogel; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.