Literature DB >> 15260192

Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Geoffrey F Woodman1, Steven J Luck.   

Abstract

Visual working memory plays a central role in most models of visual search. However, a recent study showed that search efficiency was not impaired when working memory was filled to capacity by a concurrent object memory task (Woodman, Vogel, & Luck, 2001). Objects and locations may be stored in separate working memory subsystems, and it is plausible that visual search relies on the spatial subsystem, but not on the object subsystem. In the present study, we sought to determine whether maintaining spatial information in visual working memory impairs the efficiency of a concurrent visual search task. Visual search efficiency and spatial memory accuracy were both impaired when the search and the memory tasks were performed concurrently, as compared with when the tasks were performed separately. These findings suggest that common mechanisms are used to process information during difficult visual search tasks and to maintain spatial information in working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15260192     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

4.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search: a failure to replicate.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; C W Pokorny
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

5.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations.

Authors:  E E Smith; J Jonides; R A Koeppe; E Awh; E H Schumacher; S Minoshima
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 9.  Regional and cellular fractionation of working memory.

Authors:  P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET.

Authors:  J Jonides; E E Smith; R A Koeppe; E Awh; S Minoshima; M A Mintun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  82 in total

1.  Independent sources of anisotropy in visual orientation representation: a visual and a cognitive oblique effect.

Authors:  Panagiota Balikou; Pavlos Gourtzelidis; Asimakis Mantas; Konstantinos Moutoussis; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Nikolaos Smyrnis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Enhancing visual working memory encoding: The role of target novelty.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Jejoong Kim; Sohee Park
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011

3.  Change perception using visual transients: object substitution and deletion.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Bruce Bridgeman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The role of working memory in attentional capture.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Jan De Fockert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

5.  How do we track invisible objects?

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Randall S Birnkrant; David E Fencsik; Linda Tran; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

6.  Memory processes in multiple-target visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-22

7.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search: the roles of top-down and bottom-up processing.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Matthew P Gerrie; Bradley J Poole; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

8.  Interactions between working memory and visual perception: an ERP/EEG study.

Authors:  Yigal Agam; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Richard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-02

10.  Attentive Tracking Disrupts Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.