Literature DB >> 30603990

Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Jeremy M Wolfe1,2,3, Matthew S Cain4,5, Avigael M Aizenman6.   

Abstract

In Hybrid Foraging tasks, observers search for multiple instances of several types of target. Collecting all the dirty laundry and kitchenware out of a child's room would be a real-world example. How are such foraging episodes structured? A series of four experiments shows that selection of one item from the display makes it more likely that the next item will be of the same type. This pattern holds if the targets are defined by basic features like color and shape but not if they are defined by their identity (e.g., the letters p & d). Additionally, switching between target types during search is expensive in time, with longer response times between successive selections if the target type changes than if they are the same. Finally, the decision to leave a screen/patch for the next screen in these foraging tasks is imperfectly consistent with the predictions of optimal foraging theory. The results of these hybrid foraging studies cast new light on the ways in which prior selection history guides subsequent visual search in general.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Priming; Visual search; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30603990      PMCID: PMC6408307          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  44 in total

1.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Serena J Butcher; Carol Lee; Megan Hyle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Task switching.

Authors:  Stephen Monsell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Curvature is a basic feature for visual search tasks.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; A Yee; S R Friedman-Hill
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Naomi Kenner; Megan Hyle; Nina Vasan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence.

Authors:  John T Serences; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Charlie Antebi; Neta Aviani; Tomer Carmel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey.

Authors:  Alan B Bond; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Caroline Seidel; Jeremy Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2019-08-15

2.  Attentional avoidance of threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-11

3.  The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?

Authors:  Ian M Thornton; Jérôme Tagu; Sunčica Zdravković; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-06

4.  Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Which emphasis technique to use? Perception of emphasis techniques with varying distractors, backgrounds, and visualization types.

Authors:  Aristides Mairena; Carl Gutwin; Andy Cockburn
Journal:  Inf Vis       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 0.956

6.  Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.

Authors:  Alasdair D F Clarke; Amelia R Hunt; Anna E Hughes
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Implicitly and explicitly encoded features can guide attention in free viewing.

Authors:  Aoqi Li; Jeremy M Wolfe; Zhenzhong Chen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.