Literature DB >> 21505832

Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Theresa Albrecht1, Valentin Wimmer, Hans-Jürgen Auinger, Malena Erbe, Carsten Knaak, Milena Ouzunova, Henner Simianer, Chris-Carolin Schön.   

Abstract

This is the first large-scale experimental study on genome-based prediction of testcross values in an advanced cycle breeding population of maize. The study comprised testcross progenies of 1,380 doubled haploid lines of maize derived from 36 crosses and phenotyped for grain yield and grain dry matter content in seven locations. The lines were genotyped with 1,152 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Pedigree data were available for three generations. We used best linear unbiased prediction and stratified cross-validation to evaluate the performance of prediction models differing in the modeling of relatedness between inbred lines and in the calculation of genome-based coefficients of similarity. The choice of similarity coefficient did not affect prediction accuracies. Models including genomic information yielded significantly higher prediction accuracies than the model based on pedigree information alone. Average prediction accuracies based on genomic data were high even for a complex trait like grain yield (0.72-0.74) when the cross-validation scheme allowed for a high degree of relatedness between the estimation and the test set. When predictions were performed across distantly related families, prediction accuracies decreased significantly (0.47-0.48). Prediction accuracies decreased with decreasing sample size but were still high when the population size was halved (0.67-0.69). The results from this study are encouraging with respect to genome-based prediction of the genetic value of untested lines in advanced cycle breeding populations and the implementation of genomic selection in the breeding process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21505832     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-011-1587-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  27 in total

1.  Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P M Visscher; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics.

Authors:  Patrick S Schnable; Doreen Ware; Robert S Fulton; Joshua C Stein; Fusheng Wei; Shiran Pasternak; Chengzhi Liang; Jianwei Zhang; Lucinda Fulton; Tina A Graves; Patrick Minx; Amy Denise Reily; Laura Courtney; Scott S Kruchowski; Chad Tomlinson; Cindy Strong; Kim Delehaunty; Catrina Fronick; Bill Courtney; Susan M Rock; Eddie Belter; Feiyu Du; Kyung Kim; Rachel M Abbott; Marc Cotton; Andy Levy; Pamela Marchetto; Kerri Ochoa; Stephanie M Jackson; Barbara Gillam; Weizu Chen; Le Yan; Jamey Higginbotham; Marco Cardenas; Jason Waligorski; Elizabeth Applebaum; Lindsey Phelps; Jason Falcone; Krishna Kanchi; Thynn Thane; Adam Scimone; Nay Thane; Jessica Henke; Tom Wang; Jessica Ruppert; Neha Shah; Kelsi Rotter; Jennifer Hodges; Elizabeth Ingenthron; Matt Cordes; Sara Kohlberg; Jennifer Sgro; Brandon Delgado; Kelly Mead; Asif Chinwalla; Shawn Leonard; Kevin Crouse; Kristi Collura; Dave Kudrna; Jennifer Currie; Ruifeng He; Angelina Angelova; Shanmugam Rajasekar; Teri Mueller; Rene Lomeli; Gabriel Scara; Ara Ko; Krista Delaney; Marina Wissotski; Georgina Lopez; David Campos; Michele Braidotti; Elizabeth Ashley; Wolfgang Golser; HyeRan Kim; Seunghee Lee; Jinke Lin; Zeljko Dujmic; Woojin Kim; Jayson Talag; Andrea Zuccolo; Chuanzhu Fan; Aswathy Sebastian; Melissa Kramer; Lori Spiegel; Lidia Nascimento; Theresa Zutavern; Beth Miller; Claude Ambroise; Stephanie Muller; Will Spooner; Apurva Narechania; Liya Ren; Sharon Wei; Sunita Kumari; Ben Faga; Michael J Levy; Linda McMahan; Peter Van Buren; Matthew W Vaughn; Kai Ying; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Scott J Emrich; Yi Jia; Ananth Kalyanaraman; An-Ping Hsia; W Brad Barbazuk; Regina S Baucom; Thomas P Brutnell; Nicholas C Carpita; Cristian Chaparro; Jer-Ming Chia; Jean-Marc Deragon; James C Estill; Yan Fu; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Yujun Han; Hyeran Lee; Pinghua Li; Damon R Lisch; Sanzhen Liu; Zhijie Liu; Dawn Holligan Nagel; Maureen C McCann; Phillip SanMiguel; Alan M Myers; Dan Nettleton; John Nguyen; Bryan W Penning; Lalit Ponnala; Kevin L Schneider; David C Schwartz; Anupma Sharma; Carol Soderlund; Nathan M Springer; Qi Sun; Hao Wang; Michael Waterman; Richard Westerman; Thomas K Wolfgruber; Lixing Yang; Yeisoo Yu; Lifang Zhang; Shiguo Zhou; Qihui Zhu; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; R Kelly Dawe; Jiming Jiang; Ning Jiang; Gernot G Presting; Susan R Wessler; Srinivas Aluru; Robert A Martienssen; Sandra W Clifton; W Richard McCombie; Rod A Wing; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects.

Authors:  A E Melchinger; H F Utz; C C Schön
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation.

Authors:  Tu Luan; John A Woolliams; Sigbjørn Lien; Matthew Kent; Morten Svendsen; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Performance of genomic selection in mice.

Authors:  Andrés Legarra; Christèle Robert-Granié; Eduardo Manfredi; Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  109 in total

1.  Impact of selective genotyping in the training population on accuracy and bias of genomic selection.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Manje Gowda; Friedrich H Longin; Tobias Würschum; Nicolas Ranc; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Tobias A Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Christian Riedelsheimer; H Friedrich Utz; Chris-Carolin Schön; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 4.  Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from wright, fisher and lush to genomic prediction.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The impact of recombination on short-term selection gain in plant breeding experiments.

Authors:  Benjamin McClosky; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Selfing for the design of genomic selection experiments in biparental plant populations.

Authors:  Benjamin McClosky; Jason LaCombe; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genome properties and prospects of genomic prediction of hybrid performance in a breeding program of maize.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Tobias A Schrag; Wolfgang Schipprack; Eva Bauer; Henner Simianer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Dominik Müller; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Comparisons of single-stage and two-stage approaches to genomic selection.

Authors:  Torben Schulz-Streeck; Joseph O Ogutu; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Jeffrey B Endelman; Michael Stange; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.