Literature DB >> 22733443

Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects.

Frank Technow1, Christian Riedelsheimer, Tobias A Schrag, Albrecht E Melchinger.   

Abstract

Identifying high performing hybrids is an essential part of every maize breeding program. Genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance allows to identify promising hybrids, when they themselves or other hybrids produced from their parents were not tested in field trials. Using simulations, we investigated the effects of marker density (10, 1, 0.3 marker per mega base pair, Mbp(-1)), convergent or divergent parental populations, number of parents tested in other combinations (2, 1, 0), genetic model (including population-specific and/or dominance marker effects or not), and estimation method (GBLUP or BayesB) on the prediction accuracy. We based our simulations on marker genotypes of Central European flint and dent inbred lines from an ongoing maize breeding program. To simulate convergent or divergent parent populations, we generated phenotypes by assigning QTL to markers with similar or very different allele frequencies in both pools, respectively. Prediction accuracies increased with marker density and number of parents tested and were higher under divergent compared with convergent parental populations. Modeling marker effects as population-specific slightly improved prediction accuracy under lower marker densities (1 and 0.3 Mbp(-1)). This indicated that modeling marker effects as population-specific will be most beneficial under low linkage disequilibrium. Incorporating dominance effects improved prediction accuracies considerably for convergent parent populations, where dominance results in major contributions of SCA effects to the genetic variance among inter-population hybrids. While the general trends regarding the effects of the aforementioned influence factors on prediction accuracy were similar for GBLUP and BayesB, the latter method produced significantly higher accuracies for models incorporating dominance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22733443     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1905-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  25 in total

1.  Estimation of quantitative trait locus effects with epistasis by variational Bayes algorithms.

Authors:  Zitong Li; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Impact of interpopulation divergence on additive and dominance variance in hybrid populations.

Authors:  J C Reif; F-M Gumpert; S Fischer; A E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.

Authors:  Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci.

Authors:  A Charcosset; L Essioux
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Jennie Pryce; Amanda J Chamberlain; Phil J Bowman; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.

Authors:  Samuel A Clark; John M Hickey; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome.

Authors:  Martin W Ganal; Gregor Durstewitz; Andreas Polley; Aurélie Bérard; Edward S Buckler; Alain Charcosset; Joseph D Clarke; Eva-Maria Graner; Mark Hansen; Johann Joets; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Michael D McMullen; Pierre Montalent; Mark Rose; Chris-Carolin Schön; Qi Sun; Hildrun Walter; Olivier C Martin; Matthieu Falque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  60 in total

1.  Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Christian Riedelsheimer; H Friedrich Utz; Chris-Carolin Schön; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Authors:  J-M Bouvet; G Makouanzi; D Cros; Ph Vigneron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Optimizing the allocation of resources for genomic selection in one breeding cycle.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genome properties and prospects of genomic prediction of hybrid performance in a breeding program of maize.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Tobias A Schrag; Wolfgang Schipprack; Eva Bauer; Henner Simianer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A new genomic prediction method with additive-dominance effects in the least-squares framework.

Authors:  Hailan Liu; Guo-Bo Chen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Genomic prediction of dichotomous traits with Bayesian logistic models.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Efficiency of genomic prediction of non-assessed single crosses.

Authors:  José Marcelo Soriano Viana; Helcio Duarte Pereira; Gabriel Borges Mundim; Hans-Peter Piepho; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Genome-wide association analysis of lead accumulation in maize.

Authors:  Xiongwei Zhao; Yajuan Liu; Wenmei Wu; Yuhua Li; Longxin Luo; Yuzhou Lan; Yanhua Cao; Zhiming Zhang; Shibin Gao; Guangsheng Yuan; Li Liu; Yaou Shen; Guangtang Pan; Haijian Lin
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Accounting for Group-Specific Allele Effects and Admixture in Genomic Predictions: Theory and Experimental Evaluation in Maize.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Jeffrey B Endelman; Michael Stange; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.