Literature DB >> 18076470

Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.

J C M Dekkers1.   

Abstract

Selection index methods can be used for deterministic assessment of the potential benefit of including marker information in genetic improvement programmes using marker-assisted selection (MAS). By specifying estimates of breeding values derived from marker information (M-EBV) as a correlated trait with heritability equal to 1, it was demonstrated that marker information can be incorporated in standard software for selection index predictions of response and rates of inbreeding, which requires specifying phenotypic traits and their genetic parameters. Path coefficient methods were used to derive genetic and phenotypic correlations between M-EBV and the phenotypic data. Methods were extended to multi-trait selection and to the case when M-EBV are based on high-density marker genotype data, as in genomic selection. Methods were applied to several example scenarios, which confirmed previous results that MAS substantially increases response to selection but also demonstrated that MAS can result in substantial reductions in the rates of inbreeding. Although further validation by stochastic simulation is required, the developed methodology provides an easy means of deterministically evaluating the potential benefits of MAS and to optimize selection strategies with availability of marker data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18076470     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00701.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  97 in total

1.  Accuracy of genomic selection in European maize elite breeding populations.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Manje Gowda; Wenxin Liu; Tobias Würschum; Hans P Maurer; Friedrich H Longin; Nicolas Ranc; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Impact of selective genotyping in the training population on accuracy and bias of genomic selection.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Manje Gowda; Friedrich H Longin; Tobias Würschum; Nicolas Ranc; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Christian Riedelsheimer; H Friedrich Utz; Chris-Carolin Schön; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Piter Bijma; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Shrinkage estimation of the genomic relationship matrix can improve genomic estimated breeding values in the training set.

Authors:  Dominik Müller; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Estimates of Heritability for Growth and Shell Color Traits and Their Genetic Correlations in the Black Shell Strain of Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas.

Authors:  Lan Xu; Qi Li; Hong Yu; Lingfeng Kong
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle.

Authors:  Megan M Rolf; Jeremy F Taylor; Robert D Schnabel; Stephanie D McKay; Matthew C McClure; Sally L Northcutt; Monty S Kerley; Robert L Weaber
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Dynamics of long-term genomic selection.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.